vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ECARX Holdings Inc. (ECX) and Smith Douglas Homes Corp. (SDHC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ECARX Holdings Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($323.3M vs $260.4M, roughly 1.2× Smith Douglas Homes Corp.). Smith Douglas Homes Corp. runs the higher net margin — 1.4% vs -21.4%, a 22.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, ECARX Holdings Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (6.5% vs -9.4%). Smith Douglas Homes Corp. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($8.7M vs $-86.5M).
ECARX Holdings Inc. is a global mobility technology provider specializing in integrated smart vehicle solutions, including in-vehicle infotainment systems, advanced driver assistance technologies, and connected car cloud services. It primarily partners with automotive manufacturers across the world, with a strong operational presence in the Chinese and European markets.
Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. (S&W) is an American firearm manufacturer headquartered in Maryville, Tennessee, United States.
ECX vs SDHC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $323.3M | $260.4M |
| Net Profit | $-69.1M | $3.5M |
| Gross Margin | 15.5% | 19.9% |
| Operating Margin | -20.2% | 6.5% |
| Net Margin | -21.4% | 1.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 6.5% | -9.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | 12.8% | -14.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.20 | $0.39 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $260.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $262.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $323.3M | $223.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $224.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $287.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $277.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $303.5M | $220.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $189.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | $3.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-69.1M | $2.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $4.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $5.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-79.2M | $3.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $3.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | 19.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 21.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.5% | 23.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 23.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 25.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 26.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 22.6% | 26.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 26.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | 6.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 6.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -20.2% | 7.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 8.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 10.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 14.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -22.2% | 11.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 11.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -21.4% | 1.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -26.1% | 1.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.39 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.24 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.20 | $0.26 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.30 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.50 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.58 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.23 | $0.40 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.33 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $86.2M | $12.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-293.7M | $86.7M |
| Total Assets | $494.9M | $557.6M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $12.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $14.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $86.2M | $16.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $12.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $22.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $23.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $108.4M | $17.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $32.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | $86.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $82.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-293.7M | $80.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $76.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $73.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $68.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-198.5M | $62.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $59.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | $557.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $571.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $494.9M | $570.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $513.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $475.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $460.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $555.0M | $429.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $401.3M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-82.0M | $9.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-86.5M | $8.7M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -26.7% | 3.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.4% | 0.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 2.77× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-36.9M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $9.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $22.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-82.0M | $-28.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-34.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $5.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $22.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-57.1M | $39.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-9.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | $8.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $21.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-86.5M | $-31.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-35.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $4.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $22.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-64.9M | $-2.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-9.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | 3.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 8.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -26.7% | -13.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -16.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 8.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -21.4% | -1.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -5.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.4% | 0.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.6% | 1.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | 2.77× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 10.70× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -12.24× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -13.01× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.33× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 4.28× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.01× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -3.12× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ECX
Segment breakdown not available.
SDHC
| Southeast | $164.7M | 63% |
| Central | $95.8M | 37% |
