vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ECARX Holdings Inc. (ECX) and Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. (SSD). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($588.0M vs $323.3M, roughly 1.8× ECARX Holdings Inc.). Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. runs the higher net margin — 15.0% vs -21.4%, a 36.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (9.1% vs 6.5%).
ECARX Holdings Inc. is a global mobility technology provider specializing in integrated smart vehicle solutions, including in-vehicle infotainment systems, advanced driver assistance technologies, and connected car cloud services. It primarily partners with automotive manufacturers across the world, with a strong operational presence in the Chinese and European markets.
Simpson Manufacturing Company is a leading building materials manufacturer in the United States that produces structural connectors, fasteners, anchors, and products for new construction and retrofitting.
ECX vs SSD — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $323.3M | $588.0M |
| Net Profit | $-69.1M | $88.2M |
| Gross Margin | 15.5% | 45.2% |
| Operating Margin | -20.2% | 19.5% |
| Net Margin | -21.4% | 15.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 6.5% | 9.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | 12.8% | 13.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.20 | $2.13 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $588.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $539.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $623.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $323.3M | $631.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $538.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $517.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $587.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $303.5M | $597.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $88.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $56.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $107.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-69.1M | $103.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $77.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $55.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $93.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-79.2M | $97.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | 45.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 43.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 46.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.5% | 46.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 46.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 44.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 46.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 22.6% | 46.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | 19.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 13.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 22.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -20.2% | 22.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 19.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 14.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 21.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -22.2% | 22.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | 15.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 10.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 17.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -21.4% | 16.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 14.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 10.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 15.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -26.1% | 16.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | $2.13 | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.34 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.58 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.20 | $2.47 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.85 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.31 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.21 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.23 | $2.31 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $86.2M | $341.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-293.7M | $2.1B |
| Total Assets | $494.9M | $3.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $341.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $384.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $297.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $86.2M | $190.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $150.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $239.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $339.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $108.4M | $354.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $300.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $371.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $376.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $382.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $388.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $393.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $399.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $-293.7M | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $-198.5M | $1.8B |
| Q1 26 | — | $3.0B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $3.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $3.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $494.9M | $3.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $555.0M | $2.8B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.15× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.19× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.20× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.21× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.21× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.21× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.23× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-82.0M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-86.5M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -26.7% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.4% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $155.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $170.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-82.0M | $125.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $7.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $115.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $103.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-57.1M | $111.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $119.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $133.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-86.5M | $87.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-42.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $60.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $58.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-64.9M | $70.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 22.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 21.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -26.7% | 13.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -7.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 11.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 9.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -21.4% | 11.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 6.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 5.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.4% | 6.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 9.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 10.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 7.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.6% | 6.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 2.77× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.58× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.21× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.10× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.09× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.10× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.14× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
