vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ECARX Holdings Inc. (ECX) and STARZ ENTERTAINMENT CORP (STRZ). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ECARX Holdings Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($323.3M vs $320.9M, roughly 1.0× STARZ ENTERTAINMENT CORP). STARZ ENTERTAINMENT CORP runs the higher net margin — -16.4% vs -21.4%, a 5.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, ECARX Holdings Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (6.5% vs -7.5%). STARZ ENTERTAINMENT CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-31.3M vs $-86.5M).
ECARX Holdings Inc. is a global mobility technology provider specializing in integrated smart vehicle solutions, including in-vehicle infotainment systems, advanced driver assistance technologies, and connected car cloud services. It primarily partners with automotive manufacturers across the world, with a strong operational presence in the Chinese and European markets.
Starz Entertainment Corp., formerly known as Lions Gate Entertainment Corporation, or simply Lionsgate, is a Canadian-American entertainment company currently headquartered in Santa Monica, California. Founded by Frank Giustra on July 10, 1997, it is/was domiciled and incorporated in Vancouver, British Columbia.
ECX vs STRZ — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $323.3M | $320.9M |
| Net Profit | $-69.1M | $-52.6M |
| Gross Margin | 15.5% | — |
| Operating Margin | -20.2% | -10.8% |
| Net Margin | -21.4% | -16.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 6.5% | -7.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 12.8% | -71.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.20 | $-3.15 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q3 25 | — | $320.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $323.3M | $319.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $970.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $346.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $303.5M | $347.6M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $975.1M | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $908.6M |
| Q3 25 | — | $-52.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-69.1M | $-42.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-21.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-30.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-79.2M | $4.2M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $-106.6M | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $-886.2M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $-70.7M |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 22.6% | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | — | -10.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -20.2% | -8.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -4.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -22.2% | 2.9% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | -4.5% | ||
| Q3 23 | — | -80.5% | ||
| Q2 23 | — | -1.8% |
| Q3 25 | — | -16.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -21.4% | -13.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -2.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -8.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -26.1% | 1.2% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | -10.9% | ||
| Q3 23 | — | -87.3% | ||
| Q2 23 | — | -7.8% |
| Q3 25 | — | $-3.15 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.20 | $-2.54 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.09 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-1.83 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.23 | $0.26 | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $-0.45 | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $-3.79 | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $-0.31 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $86.2M | $37.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $608.7M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-293.7M | $663.2M |
| Total Assets | $494.9M | $2.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.92× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | — | $37.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $86.2M | $51.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $200.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $229.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $108.4M | $192.5M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $283.0M | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $223.6M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $322.7M |
| Q3 25 | — | $608.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $611.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $1.9B |
| Q3 25 | — | $663.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-293.7M | $712.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-168.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $935.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-198.5M | $973.1M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $-325.5M | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $-221.1M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $726.4M |
| Q3 25 | — | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $494.9M | $2.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $7.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $7.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $555.0M | $7.2B | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $7.2B | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $6.2B | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $7.5B |
| Q3 25 | — | 0.92× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.86× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.24× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.59× | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | 2.60× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-82.0M | $-26.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-86.5M | $-31.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -26.7% | -9.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.4% | 1.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-317.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | — | $-26.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-82.0M | $65.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-335.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $9.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-57.1M | $-33.5M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $71.1M | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $301.1M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $29.2M |
| Q3 25 | — | $-31.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-86.5M | $58.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-349.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $4.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-64.9M | $-38.4M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $64.7M | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $291.7M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $20.3M |
| Q3 25 | — | -9.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -26.7% | 18.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -36.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -21.4% | -11.0% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | 6.6% | ||
| Q3 23 | — | 28.7% | ||
| Q2 23 | — | 2.2% |
| Q3 25 | — | 1.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.4% | 2.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.6% | 1.4% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | 0.7% | ||
| Q3 23 | — | 0.9% | ||
| Q2 23 | — | 1.0% |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -7.98× | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ECX
Segment breakdown not available.
STRZ
| Over The Top Subscription Service OTT | $222.8M | 69% |
| Linear Subscription Service | $98.1M | 31% |