vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ECARX Holdings Inc. (ECX) and Upstart Holdings, Inc. (UPST). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ECARX Holdings Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($323.3M vs $296.1M, roughly 1.1× Upstart Holdings, Inc.). Upstart Holdings, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 6.3% vs -21.4%, a 27.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Upstart Holdings, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (35.2% vs 6.5%). Upstart Holdings, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($108.4M vs $-86.5M).
ECARX Holdings Inc. is a global mobility technology provider specializing in integrated smart vehicle solutions, including in-vehicle infotainment systems, advanced driver assistance technologies, and connected car cloud services. It primarily partners with automotive manufacturers across the world, with a strong operational presence in the Chinese and European markets.
Upstart is an AI lending platform that partners with banks and credit unions to provide consumer loans using non-traditional variables, such as education and employment, to predict creditworthiness.
ECX vs UPST — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $323.3M | $296.1M |
| Net Profit | $-69.1M | $18.6M |
| Gross Margin | 15.5% | — |
| Operating Margin | -20.2% | 6.4% |
| Net Margin | -21.4% | 6.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 6.5% | 35.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 12.8% | 776.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.20 | $0.20 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $296.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $277.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $323.3M | $257.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $213.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $219.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $162.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $303.5M | $127.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $127.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | $18.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $31.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-69.1M | $5.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-2.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-2.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-6.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-79.2M | $-54.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-64.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 22.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 6.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 8.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -20.2% | 1.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -2.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -2.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -27.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -22.2% | -43.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -52.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | 6.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 11.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -21.4% | 2.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -1.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -1.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -4.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -26.1% | -42.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -50.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.20 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.23 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.20 | $0.05 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.03 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.01 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.07 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.23 | $-0.62 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.74 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $86.2M | $652.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-293.7M | $798.8M |
| Total Assets | $494.9M | $3.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $652.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $489.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $86.2M | $395.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $599.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $788.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $108.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $798.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $743.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-293.7M | $722.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $676.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $633.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $595.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-198.5M | $594.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $612.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | $3.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $494.9M | $2.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $555.0M | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.9B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-82.0M | $108.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-86.5M | $108.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -26.7% | 36.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.4% | 0.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 5.82× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $108.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-122.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-82.0M | $-120.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-13.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-110.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $179.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-57.1M | $65.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $52.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | $108.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-122.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-86.5M | $-120.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $179.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-64.9M | $65.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $51.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | 36.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -44.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -26.7% | -46.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 110.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -21.4% | 51.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 40.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.4% | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.6% | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | 5.82× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -3.86× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -21.43× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ECX
Segment breakdown not available.
UPST
| Personal Lending Segment | $201.4M | 68% |
| Servicing Fees Net | $39.5M | 13% |
| Servicing Fees | $27.5M | 9% |
| Other | $15.7M | 5% |
| Borrower Fees | $8.4M | 3% |
| Collection Agency Fees | $3.5M | 1% |
