vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ECARX Holdings Inc. (ECX) and UNIVERSAL TECHNICAL INSTITUTE INC (UTI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ECARX Holdings Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($323.3M vs $221.4M, roughly 1.5× UNIVERSAL TECHNICAL INSTITUTE INC). UNIVERSAL TECHNICAL INSTITUTE INC runs the higher net margin — 0.2% vs -21.4%, a 21.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, UNIVERSAL TECHNICAL INSTITUTE INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (6.7% vs 6.5%).
ECARX Holdings Inc. is a global mobility technology provider specializing in integrated smart vehicle solutions, including in-vehicle infotainment systems, advanced driver assistance technologies, and connected car cloud services. It primarily partners with automotive manufacturers across the world, with a strong operational presence in the Chinese and European markets.
Universal Technical Institute, Inc. (UTI) is a private for-profit system of technical colleges in the United States. It was established in 1965 by Robert Sweet.
ECX vs UTI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $323.3M | $221.4M |
| Net Profit | $-69.1M | $433.0K |
| Gross Margin | 15.5% | — |
| Operating Margin | -20.2% | 0.2% |
| Net Margin | -21.4% | 0.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 6.5% | 6.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 12.8% | -60.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.20 | $0.01 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $221.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $220.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $222.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $323.3M | $204.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $207.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $201.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $196.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $303.5M | $177.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | $433.0K | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $12.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $18.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-69.1M | $10.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $11.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $22.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $18.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-79.2M | $5.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 22.6% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 7.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 11.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -20.2% | 6.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 8.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 13.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 13.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -22.2% | 4.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 5.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 8.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -21.4% | 5.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 5.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 11.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 9.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -26.1% | 2.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.01 | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $0.23 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.33 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.20 | $0.19 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.21 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.40 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.35 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.23 | $0.09 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $86.2M | $162.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $127.8M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-293.7M | $339.9M |
| Total Assets | $494.9M | $852.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.38× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $162.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $162.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $169.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $86.2M | $70.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $96.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $172.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $161.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $108.4M | $115.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | $127.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $101.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $87.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $73.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $94.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $120.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $125.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $137.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | $339.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $335.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $328.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-293.7M | $306.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $293.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $280.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $260.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-198.5M | $239.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | $852.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $834.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $826.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $494.9M | $740.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $720.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $753.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $744.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $555.0M | $706.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.38× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.30× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.27× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.24× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.32× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.43× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.48× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.57× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-82.0M | $7.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-86.5M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -26.7% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.4% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 16.33× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $7.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $3.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $57.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-82.0M | $18.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-789.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $23.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $67.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-57.1M | $10.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-19.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $40.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-86.5M | $6.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-11.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $19.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $60.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-64.9M | $3.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -8.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 18.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -26.7% | 3.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -5.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 9.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 30.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -21.4% | 1.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 10.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 7.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.4% | 5.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 5.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.6% | 4.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | 16.33× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.24× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.04× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.69× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -0.07× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.04× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.58× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.01× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
