vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Consolidated Edison (ED) and Satellogic Inc. (SATL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Satellogic Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($6.2M vs $4.0M, roughly 1.6× Consolidated Edison).
Consolidated Edison, Inc., commonly known as Con Edison or ConEd, is an energy company based in New York City. It is one of the largest investor-owned energy companies in the United States, with approximately $15.26 billion in annual revenues as of 2024, and over $70 billion in assets. The company provides a wide range of energy-related products and services to its customers through its subsidiaries:Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc.
Satellogic Inc. is an American company specializing in Earth-observation satellites, founded in 2010 by Emiliano Kargieman and Gerardo Richarte.
ED vs SATL — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $4.0M | $6.2M |
| Net Profit | — | $30.5M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 12.2% | -114.2% |
| Net Margin | — | 488.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 8.9% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | — | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.82 | $0.24 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $4.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.0B | $6.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.6B | $3.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.6B | $4.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.9B | $3.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.7B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.2B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.3B | $3.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $298.0M | $30.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $688.0M | $4.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $246.0M | $-6.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $791.0M | $-32.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $310.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $588.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $202.0M | $-18.1M |
| Q1 26 | 12.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 12.3% | -114.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.2% | -222.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.8% | -141.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 23.0% | -280.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.7% | -419.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 7.5% | 488.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.1% | 109.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.8% | -149.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.2% | -961.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.1% | -517.0% |
| Q1 26 | $0.82 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.81 | $0.24 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.90 | $-0.02 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.68 | $-0.06 | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.25 | $-0.34 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.89 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.69 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.58 | $-0.20 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $94.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $60.5M |
| Total Assets | — | $151.3M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.6B | $94.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $181.0M | $28.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $32.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $360.0M | $17.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $93.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | $25.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $25.8B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $24.7B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $24.2B | $60.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $24.2B | $-56.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.8B | $-68.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $23.8B | $-83.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $22.0B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $21.9B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $21.6B | $19.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $74.6B | $151.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $71.8B | $70.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $71.5B | $73.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $70.7B | $61.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $70.6B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $68.6B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $67.9B | $76.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.07× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.13× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $-9.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-12.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -204.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 53.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | -0.31× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-34.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | $-9.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $504.0M | $-8.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.0B | $-4.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $837.0M | $-4.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $392.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3B | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-12.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-9.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-5.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-6.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -204.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -267.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -115.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -195.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 53.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 36.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 17.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 56.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.97× | -0.31× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.73× | -2.11× | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.04× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.06× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.23× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.67× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.63× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ED
| Electric | $2.9M | 72% |
| Gas | $923.0K | 23% |
| Other | $187.0K | 5% |
| Non-utility | $1.0K | 0% |
SATL
| Transferred At Point In Time | $5.7M | 91% |
| Other | $547.0K | 9% |
