vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Excelerate Energy, Inc. (EE) and Kimco Realty (KIM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Kimco Realty is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($558.0M vs $317.6M, roughly 1.8× Excelerate Energy, Inc.). On growth, Excelerate Energy, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (15.7% vs 4.0%). Over the past eight quarters, Excelerate Energy, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (26.0% CAGR vs 5.6%).

Excelerate Energy, Inc. is a global leading provider of flexible liquefied natural gas (LNG) solutions, offering floating storage and regasification units, LNG delivery services and integrated infrastructure projects. It serves utility and industrial clients across Europe, Asia, Latin America and the Middle East, supporting markets to achieve accessible low-carbon energy transitions.

Kimco Realty Corporation, headquartered in Jericho, New York, is a real estate investment trust that invests in shopping centers.

EE vs KIM — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
KIM
KIM
1.8× larger
KIM
$558.0M
$317.6M
EE
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
EE
EE
+11.7% gap
EE
15.7%
4.0%
KIM
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
EE
EE
Annualised
EE
26.0%
5.6%
KIM

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026

Metric
EE
EE
KIM
KIM
Revenue
$317.6M
$558.0M
Net Profit
$166.3M
Gross Margin
Operating Margin
22.2%
37.2%
Net Margin
29.8%
Revenue YoY
15.7%
4.0%
Net Profit YoY
23.7%
EPS (diluted)
$0.24
$0.46

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
EE
EE
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
$558.0M
Q4 25
$317.6M
$542.5M
Q3 25
$391.0M
$535.9M
Q2 25
$204.6M
$525.2M
Q1 25
$315.1M
$536.6M
Q4 24
$274.6M
$525.4M
Q3 24
$193.4M
$507.6M
Q2 24
$183.3M
$500.2M
Net Profit
EE
EE
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
$166.3M
Q4 25
$151.2M
Q3 25
$137.8M
Q2 25
$163.0M
Q1 25
$132.8M
Q4 24
$166.0M
Q3 24
$136.0M
Q2 24
$119.7M
Operating Margin
EE
EE
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
37.2%
Q4 25
22.2%
36.4%
Q3 25
22.3%
34.9%
Q2 25
21.2%
39.2%
Q1 25
20.9%
33.6%
Q4 24
21.9%
31.7%
Q3 24
30.9%
33.7%
Q2 24
27.2%
32.1%
Net Margin
EE
EE
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
29.8%
Q4 25
27.9%
Q3 25
25.7%
Q2 25
31.0%
Q1 25
24.8%
Q4 24
31.6%
Q3 24
26.8%
Q2 24
23.9%
EPS (diluted)
EE
EE
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
$0.46
Q4 25
$0.24
Q3 25
$0.43
Q2 25
$0.15
Q1 25
$0.46
Q4 24
$0.42
Q3 24
$0.35
Q2 24
$0.26

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
EE
EE
KIM
KIM
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$538.2M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$936.3M
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$2.2B
$10.4B
Total Assets
$4.1B
$19.6B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.42×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
EE
EE
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
Q4 25
$538.2M
$211.6M
Q3 25
$462.6M
$159.3M
Q2 25
$426.0M
$226.6M
Q1 25
$619.5M
$131.3M
Q4 24
$537.5M
$688.6M
Q3 24
$608.4M
$789.0M
Q2 24
$609.1M
$126.4M
Total Debt
EE
EE
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
Q4 25
$936.3M
$7.7B
Q3 25
$942.0M
Q2 25
$946.2M
Q1 25
$322.6M
Q4 24
$333.6M
$8.0B
Q3 24
$345.7M
Q2 24
$356.4M
Stockholders' Equity
EE
EE
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
$10.4B
Q4 25
$2.2B
$10.4B
Q3 25
$2.2B
$10.5B
Q2 25
$2.1B
$10.5B
Q1 25
$1.9B
$10.6B
Q4 24
$1.9B
$10.7B
Q3 24
$1.9B
$10.5B
Q2 24
$1.8B
$10.6B
Total Assets
EE
EE
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
$19.6B
Q4 25
$4.1B
$19.7B
Q3 25
$4.1B
$19.9B
Q2 25
$4.0B
$19.8B
Q1 25
$2.9B
$19.7B
Q4 24
$2.9B
$20.3B
Q3 24
$2.9B
$20.1B
Q2 24
$2.9B
$19.5B
Debt / Equity
EE
EE
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
Q4 25
0.42×
0.74×
Q3 25
0.43×
Q2 25
0.44×
Q1 25
0.17×
Q4 24
0.18×
0.75×
Q3 24
0.18×
Q2 24
0.19×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
EE
EE
KIM
KIM
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$104.4M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
EE
EE
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
Q4 25
$104.4M
$258.4M
Q3 25
$114.9M
$332.4M
Q2 25
$87.1M
$305.4M
Q1 25
$154.8M
$223.8M
Q4 24
$49.6M
$239.5M
Q3 24
$39.8M
$295.9M
Q2 24
$90.4M
$294.1M
Free Cash Flow
EE
EE
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
Q4 25
Q3 25
Q2 25
Q1 25
$205.4M
Q4 24
Q3 24
Q2 24
FCF Margin
EE
EE
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
Q4 25
Q3 25
Q2 25
Q1 25
38.3%
Q4 24
Q3 24
Q2 24
Capex Intensity
EE
EE
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
Q4 25
0.0%
Q3 25
0.0%
Q2 25
0.0%
Q1 25
3.4%
Q4 24
Q3 24
Q2 24
Cash Conversion
EE
EE
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
Q4 25
1.71×
Q3 25
2.41×
Q2 25
1.87×
Q1 25
1.69×
Q4 24
1.44×
Q3 24
2.18×
Q2 24
2.46×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

EE
EE

Other$179.4M57%
Revenue From Leases$138.1M43%

KIM
KIM

Revenues from rental properties, net$552.8M99%
Management and other fee income$5.2M1%

Related Comparisons