vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of EURONET WORLDWIDE, INC. (EEFT) and GLOBAL PARTNERS LP (GLP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

GLOBAL PARTNERS LP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.2B vs $1.1B, roughly 2.0× EURONET WORLDWIDE, INC.). EURONET WORLDWIDE, INC. runs the higher net margin — 4.7% vs 1.1%, a 3.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, GLOBAL PARTNERS LP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (7.0% vs 5.9%). EURONET WORLDWIDE, INC. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($434.3M vs $62.2M). Over the past eight quarters, EURONET WORLDWIDE, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (13.7% CAGR vs 0.2%).

Euronet Worldwide is an American provider of global electronic payment services with headquarters in Leawood, Kansas. It offers automated teller machines (ATM), point of sale (POS) services, credit/debit card services, currency exchange and other electronic financial services and payments software. Among others, it provides the prepaid subsidiaries Transact, PaySpot, epay, Movilcarga, TeleRecarga and ATX.

Global Partners LP is an American energy supply company ranked 361 in the 2018 Fortune 500. The company is organized as a master limited partnership, and its operations focus on the importing of petroleum products and marketing them in North America. It wholesales products like crude oil, diesel oil, gasoline, heating oil and kerosene.

EEFT vs GLP — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
GLP
GLP
2.0× larger
GLP
$2.2B
$1.1B
EEFT
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
GLP
GLP
+1.1% gap
GLP
7.0%
5.9%
EEFT
Higher net margin
EEFT
EEFT
3.5% more per $
EEFT
4.7%
1.1%
GLP
More free cash flow
EEFT
EEFT
$372.1M more FCF
EEFT
$434.3M
$62.2M
GLP
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
EEFT
EEFT
Annualised
EEFT
13.7%
0.2%
GLP

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
EEFT
EEFT
GLP
GLP
Revenue
$1.1B
$2.2B
Net Profit
$51.8M
$25.1M
Gross Margin
11.9%
Operating Margin
9.1%
2.6%
Net Margin
4.7%
1.1%
Revenue YoY
5.9%
7.0%
Net Profit YoY
14.3%
5.0%
EPS (diluted)
$0.97

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
EEFT
EEFT
GLP
GLP
Q4 25
$1.1B
$2.2B
Q3 25
$1.1B
$2.2B
Q2 25
$1.1B
$2.1B
Q1 25
$915.5M
$2.2B
Q4 24
$1.0B
$2.1B
Q3 24
$1.1B
$2.1B
Q2 24
$986.2M
$2.3B
Q1 24
$857.0M
$2.2B
Net Profit
EEFT
EEFT
GLP
GLP
Q4 25
$51.8M
$25.1M
Q3 25
$122.0M
$29.0M
Q2 25
$97.6M
$25.2M
Q1 25
$38.4M
$18.7M
Q4 24
$45.3M
$23.9M
Q3 24
$151.5M
$45.9M
Q2 24
$83.1M
$46.1M
Q1 24
$26.2M
$-5.6M
Gross Margin
EEFT
EEFT
GLP
GLP
Q4 25
11.9%
Q3 25
12.1%
Q2 25
13.1%
Q1 25
11.7%
Q4 24
13.0%
Q3 24
13.4%
Q2 24
12.6%
Q1 24
9.8%
Operating Margin
EEFT
EEFT
GLP
GLP
Q4 25
9.1%
2.6%
Q3 25
17.0%
2.7%
Q2 25
14.8%
2.9%
Q1 25
8.2%
2.6%
Q4 24
11.7%
2.8%
Q3 24
16.6%
3.9%
Q2 24
13.6%
3.7%
Q1 24
7.5%
1.2%
Net Margin
EEFT
EEFT
GLP
GLP
Q4 25
4.7%
1.1%
Q3 25
10.6%
1.3%
Q2 25
9.1%
1.2%
Q1 25
4.2%
0.9%
Q4 24
4.3%
1.2%
Q3 24
13.8%
2.1%
Q2 24
8.4%
2.0%
Q1 24
3.1%
-0.3%
EPS (diluted)
EEFT
EEFT
GLP
GLP
Q4 25
$0.97
Q3 25
$2.75
Q2 25
$2.27
Q1 25
$0.85
Q4 24
$0.96
Q3 24
$3.21
Q2 24
$1.73
Q1 24
$0.55

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
EEFT
EEFT
GLP
GLP
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$1.0B
Total DebtLower is stronger
$1.0B
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$1.3B
Total Assets
$6.5B
$3.9B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.79×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
EEFT
EEFT
GLP
GLP
Q4 25
$1.0B
Q3 25
$1.2B
Q2 25
$1.3B
Q1 25
$1.4B
Q4 24
$1.3B
Q3 24
$1.5B
Q2 24
$1.3B
Q1 24
$1.2B
Total Debt
EEFT
EEFT
GLP
GLP
Q4 25
$1.0B
Q3 25
$1.1B
Q2 25
$1.0B
Q1 25
$1.9B
Q4 24
$1.1B
Q3 24
$1.2B
Q2 24
$1.0B
Q1 24
$1.3B
Stockholders' Equity
EEFT
EEFT
GLP
GLP
Q4 25
$1.3B
Q3 25
$1.3B
Q2 25
$1.4B
Q1 25
$1.3B
Q4 24
$1.2B
Q3 24
$1.4B
Q2 24
$1.2B
Q1 24
$1.2B
Total Assets
EEFT
EEFT
GLP
GLP
Q4 25
$6.5B
$3.9B
Q3 25
$6.3B
$3.7B
Q2 25
$6.6B
$3.8B
Q1 25
$6.1B
$3.8B
Q4 24
$5.8B
$3.8B
Q3 24
$6.3B
$3.7B
Q2 24
$6.1B
$3.8B
Q1 24
$5.7B
$3.5B
Debt / Equity
EEFT
EEFT
GLP
GLP
Q4 25
0.79×
Q3 25
0.85×
Q2 25
0.74×
Q1 25
1.46×
Q4 24
0.92×
Q3 24
0.88×
Q2 24
0.85×
Q1 24
1.01×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
EEFT
EEFT
GLP
GLP
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$559.8M
$101.0M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$434.3M
$62.2M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
39.2%
2.8%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
11.3%
1.8%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
10.81×
4.03×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$722.3M
$193.3M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
EEFT
EEFT
GLP
GLP
Q4 25
$559.8M
$101.0M
Q3 25
$197.3M
$19.0M
Q2 25
$182.9M
$216.3M
Q1 25
$1.7M
$-51.6M
Q4 24
$732.8M
$67.2M
Q3 24
$440.3M
$122.7M
Q2 24
$182.2M
$24.3M
Q1 24
$30.0M
$-182.7M
Free Cash Flow
EEFT
EEFT
GLP
GLP
Q4 25
$434.3M
$62.2M
Q3 25
$161.2M
$-678.0K
Q2 25
$148.3M
$201.3M
Q1 25
$-21.5M
$-69.5M
Q4 24
$615.6M
$20.4M
Q3 24
$414.5M
$98.4M
Q2 24
$148.8M
$8.7M
Q1 24
$6.2M
$-199.3M
FCF Margin
EEFT
EEFT
GLP
GLP
Q4 25
39.2%
2.8%
Q3 25
14.1%
-0.0%
Q2 25
13.8%
9.7%
Q1 25
-2.3%
-3.2%
Q4 24
58.8%
1.0%
Q3 24
37.7%
4.6%
Q2 24
15.1%
0.4%
Q1 24
0.7%
-9.0%
Capex Intensity
EEFT
EEFT
GLP
GLP
Q4 25
11.3%
1.8%
Q3 25
3.2%
0.9%
Q2 25
3.2%
0.7%
Q1 25
2.5%
0.8%
Q4 24
11.2%
2.3%
Q3 24
2.3%
1.1%
Q2 24
3.4%
0.7%
Q1 24
2.8%
0.8%
Cash Conversion
EEFT
EEFT
GLP
GLP
Q4 25
10.81×
4.03×
Q3 25
1.62×
0.66×
Q2 25
1.87×
8.58×
Q1 25
0.04×
-2.76×
Q4 24
16.18×
2.82×
Q3 24
2.91×
2.67×
Q2 24
2.19×
0.53×
Q1 24
1.15×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

EEFT
EEFT

Segment breakdown not available.

GLP
GLP

Gasoline$1.0B46%
Refined Petroleum Products Renewable Fuels Crude Oil And Propane$884.7M40%
Commercial Segment$187.6M8%
Station Operations$110.5M5%

Related Comparisons