vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of EURONET WORLDWIDE, INC. (EEFT) and RXO, Inc. (RXO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
RXO, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.5B vs $1.1B, roughly 1.3× EURONET WORLDWIDE, INC.). EURONET WORLDWIDE, INC. runs the higher net margin — 4.7% vs -3.1%, a 7.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, EURONET WORLDWIDE, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (5.9% vs -11.9%). EURONET WORLDWIDE, INC. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($434.3M vs $-9.0M). Over the past eight quarters, RXO, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (26.8% CAGR vs 13.7%).
Euronet Worldwide is an American provider of global electronic payment services with headquarters in Leawood, Kansas. It offers automated teller machines (ATM), point of sale (POS) services, credit/debit card services, currency exchange and other electronic financial services and payments software. Among others, it provides the prepaid subsidiaries Transact, PaySpot, epay, Movilcarga, TeleRecarga and ATX.
RXO, Inc. is a leading transportation and logistics solutions provider headquartered in the United States. Its core service portfolio includes freight brokerage, last-mile delivery for heavy and bulky goods, managed transportation services, and end-to-end supply chain optimization support, primarily catering to clients across the North American manufacturing, retail, and e-commerce segments.
EEFT vs RXO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.1B | $1.5B |
| Net Profit | $51.8M | $-46.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 9.1% | -2.9% |
| Net Margin | 4.7% | -3.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 5.9% | -11.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | 14.3% | -84.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.97 | $-0.28 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $915.5M | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.0B | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $986.2M | $930.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $857.0M | $913.0M |
| Q4 25 | $51.8M | $-46.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $122.0M | $-14.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $97.6M | $-9.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $38.4M | $-31.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $45.3M | $-25.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $151.5M | $-243.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $83.1M | $-7.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $26.2M | $-15.0M |
| Q4 25 | 9.1% | -2.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 17.0% | -0.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.2% | -2.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.7% | -1.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.6% | -1.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 7.5% | -1.3% |
| Q4 25 | 4.7% | -3.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.6% | -1.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.1% | -0.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.2% | -2.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.3% | -1.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.8% | -23.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.4% | -0.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.1% | -1.6% |
| Q4 25 | $0.97 | $-0.28 | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.75 | $-0.08 | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.27 | $-0.05 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.85 | $-0.18 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.96 | $-0.17 | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.21 | $-1.81 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.73 | $-0.06 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.55 | $-0.13 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.0B | $17.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $1.0B | $387.0M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.3B | $1.5B |
| Total Assets | $6.5B | $3.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.79× | 0.25× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.0B | $17.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $25.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $18.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | $16.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | $35.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | $55.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3B | $7.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.2B | $7.0M |
| Q4 25 | $1.0B | $387.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $387.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.0B | $387.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9B | $387.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $351.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $352.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0B | $370.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.3B | $351.0M |
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.4B | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $579.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.2B | $582.0M |
| Q4 25 | $6.5B | $3.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.3B | $3.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.6B | $3.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.1B | $3.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.8B | $3.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.3B | $3.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.1B | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.7B | $1.8B |
| Q4 25 | 0.79× | 0.25× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.85× | 0.24× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.74× | 0.24× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.46× | 0.24× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.92× | 0.22× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.88× | 0.21× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.85× | 0.64× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.01× | 0.60× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $559.8M | $7.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $434.3M | $-9.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 39.2% | -0.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 11.3% | 1.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 10.81× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $722.3M | $-8.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $559.8M | $7.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $197.3M | $23.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $182.9M | $23.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7M | $-2.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $732.8M | $-7.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $440.3M | $-7.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $182.2M | $-5.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $30.0M | $7.0M |
| Q4 25 | $434.3M | $-9.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $161.2M | $9.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $148.3M | $9.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-21.5M | $-17.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $615.6M | $-19.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $414.5M | $-18.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $148.8M | $-16.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.2M | $-4.0M |
| Q4 25 | 39.2% | -0.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.1% | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.8% | 0.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.3% | -1.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 58.8% | -1.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 37.7% | -1.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.1% | -1.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.7% | -0.4% |
| Q4 25 | 11.3% | 1.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.2% | 1.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.2% | 1.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.5% | 1.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.2% | 0.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.3% | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.4% | 1.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.8% | 1.2% |
| Q4 25 | 10.81× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.62× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.87× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.04× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.18× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.91× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.19× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.15× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
EEFT
Segment breakdown not available.
RXO
| Retail Sector | $546.0M | 37% |
| Last Mile | $298.0M | 20% |
| Food And Beverage Sector | $225.0M | 15% |
| Other Sector | $185.0M | 13% |
| Managed Transportation | $133.0M | 9% |
| Automotive Sector | $93.0M | 6% |