vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Emerald Holding, Inc. (EEX) and KULICKE & SOFFA INDUSTRIES INC (KLIC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
KULICKE & SOFFA INDUSTRIES INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($199.6M vs $132.7M, roughly 1.5× Emerald Holding, Inc.). KULICKE & SOFFA INDUSTRIES INC runs the higher net margin — 8.4% vs -22.8%, a 31.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Emerald Holding, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (24.3% vs 20.2%). Emerald Holding, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($11.7M vs $-11.6M).
TVS Emerald Haven Realty Limited is an Indian real estate development company headquartered in Chennai, Tamil Nadu. A subsidiary of TVS Holdings, it specializes in sustainable residential communities and urban development projects.
Kulicke & Soffa Industries Inc. is a leading global provider of semiconductor packaging and assembly equipment, materials, and process solutions. It serves semiconductor manufacturers across automotive electronics, consumer devices, industrial systems, and high-performance computing markets, with core offerings covering wire bonding and advanced packaging technologies.
EEX vs KLIC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $132.7M | $199.6M |
| Net Profit | $-30.2M | $16.8M |
| Gross Margin | — | 49.6% |
| Operating Margin | -11.8% | 8.9% |
| Net Margin | -22.8% | 8.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 24.3% | 20.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -692.2% | -79.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.15 | $0.32 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $199.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $132.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $77.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $105.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $147.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $106.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $72.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $86.0M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $16.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-30.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-14.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-11.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.8M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 49.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 8.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | -11.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -10.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 24.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -6.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.4% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 8.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | -22.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -18.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -15.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -3.3% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.32 | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.15 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.07 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.01 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.08 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.01 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.05 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.03 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $100.9M | $481.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $338.8M | $825.0M |
| Total Assets | $1.2B | $1.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $481.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $100.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $95.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $156.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $276.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $194.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $188.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $193.2M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $825.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $338.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $369.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $389.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $392.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $385.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $391.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $407.6M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.0B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $12.3M | $-8.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $11.7M | $-11.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 8.8% | -5.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.5% | 1.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | -0.53× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $41.4M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $-8.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $12.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $20.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.8M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $-11.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $11.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $19.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.6M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | -5.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | 8.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 18.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.2% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.2% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | -0.53× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.82× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.04× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
EEX
| Connections Segment | $121.9M | 92% |
| Commerce Segment | $5.5M | 4% |
| Content | $5.3M | 4% |
KLIC
| Ball Bonding Equipment Segment | $110.3M | 55% |
| Aftermarket Products And Services APS Segment Post Cessation | $45.1M | 23% |
| Wedge Bonding Equipment Segment | $21.1M | 11% |
| Automotiveand Industrial | $13.6M | 7% |
| All Others Segment | $11.4M | 6% |
