vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Emerald Holding, Inc. (EEX) and Katapult Holdings, Inc. (KPLT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Emerald Holding, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($132.7M vs $73.9M, roughly 1.8× Katapult Holdings, Inc.). Katapult Holdings, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 26.8% vs -22.8%, a 49.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Emerald Holding, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (24.3% vs 17.3%). Emerald Holding, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($11.7M vs $-12.0M). Over the past eight quarters, Katapult Holdings, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (6.6% CAGR vs -0.3%).
TVS Emerald Haven Realty Limited is an Indian real estate development company headquartered in Chennai, Tamil Nadu. A subsidiary of TVS Holdings, it specializes in sustainable residential communities and urban development projects.
Katapult Holdings, Inc. is a U.S.-based fintech company that provides accessible point-of-sale lease-to-purchase solutions for consumers with limited or no traditional credit history. It partners with a wide network of e-commerce platforms and brick-and-mortar retail merchants across segments including electronics, furniture and home goods to offer flexible payment plans for customers to obtain needed products.
EEX vs KPLT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $132.7M | $73.9M |
| Net Profit | $-30.2M | $19.8M |
| Gross Margin | — | 15.6% |
| Operating Margin | -11.8% | -1.4% |
| Net Margin | -22.8% | 26.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 24.3% | 17.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | -692.2% | 307.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.15 | $3.69 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $132.7M | $73.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $77.5M | $74.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $105.5M | $71.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $147.7M | $71.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $106.8M | $63.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $72.6M | $60.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $86.0M | $58.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $133.4M | $65.1M |
| Q4 25 | $-30.2M | $19.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-14.4M | $-4.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.4M | $-7.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.3M | $-5.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.1M | $-9.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-11.1M | $-8.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.8M | $-6.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.0M | $-570.0K |
| Q4 25 | — | 15.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 19.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 15.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 19.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 11.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 19.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 16.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 25.3% |
| Q4 25 | -11.8% | -1.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -10.1% | 3.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.7% | -2.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 24.2% | -0.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.5% | -7.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -6.5% | -7.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.4% | -4.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 18.2% | 5.8% |
| Q4 25 | -22.8% | 26.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -18.6% | -6.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.3% | -10.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.4% | -7.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.8% | -15.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -15.3% | -14.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -3.3% | -11.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.2% | -0.9% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.15 | $3.69 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.07 | $-0.94 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.01 | $-1.63 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.08 | $-1.23 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.01 | $-2.17 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.05 | $-2.05 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.03 | $-1.61 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.00 | $-0.13 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $100.9M | $22.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $338.8M | $-38.1M |
| Total Assets | $1.2B | $107.9M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $100.9M | $22.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $95.4M | $3.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $156.4M | $3.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $276.8M | $6.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $194.8M | $3.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $188.9M | $25.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $193.2M | $33.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $186.8M | $31.2M |
| Q4 25 | $338.8M | $-38.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $369.5M | $-58.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $389.4M | $-54.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $392.1M | $-51.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $385.9M | $-46.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $391.1M | $-40.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $407.6M | $-32.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-90.7M | $-27.5M |
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $107.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $85.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $90.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $88.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.0B | $93.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $92.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $106.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.1B | $106.6M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $12.3M | $-11.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $11.7M | $-12.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 8.8% | -16.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.5% | 0.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | -0.60× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $41.4M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $12.3M | $-11.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.8M | $4.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.9M | $-6.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.6M | $3.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $20.6M | $-32.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.1M | $-5.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.8M | $-628.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.3M | $2.0M |
| Q4 25 | $11.7M | $-12.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5M | $4.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.4M | $3.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $19.9M | $-32.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.0M | $-5.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.6M | $-653.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | 8.8% | -16.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.9% | 5.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.4% | 4.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 18.6% | -51.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.4% | -9.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.2% | -1.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.5% | 0.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.4% | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.1% | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.1% | 0.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.7% | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.1% | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.2% | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.2% | 0.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | -0.60× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.82× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.04× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.66× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
EEX
| Connections Segment | $121.9M | 92% |
| Commerce Segment | $5.5M | 4% |
| Content | $5.3M | 4% |
KPLT
Segment breakdown not available.
