vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Emerald Holding, Inc. (EEX) and MERCURY SYSTEMS INC (MRCY). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
MERCURY SYSTEMS INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($235.8M vs $132.7M, roughly 1.8× Emerald Holding, Inc.). MERCURY SYSTEMS INC runs the higher net margin — -1.2% vs -22.8%, a 21.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Emerald Holding, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (24.3% vs 11.5%). Emerald Holding, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($11.7M vs $-1.8M). Over the past eight quarters, Emerald Holding, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (-0.3% CAGR vs -2.6%).
TVS Emerald Haven Realty Limited is an Indian real estate development company headquartered in Chennai, Tamil Nadu. A subsidiary of TVS Holdings, it specializes in sustainable residential communities and urban development projects.
Mercury Systems, Inc. is a technology company serving the aerospace and defense industry. It designs, develops and manufactures open architecture computer hardware and software products, including secure embedded processing modules and subsystems, avionics mission computers and displays, rugged secure computer servers, and trusted microelectronics components, modules and subsystems.
EEX vs MRCY — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $132.7M | $235.8M |
| Net Profit | $-30.2M | $-2.9M |
| Gross Margin | — | 99.6% |
| Operating Margin | -11.8% | 72.9% |
| Net Margin | -22.8% | -1.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 24.3% | 11.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -692.2% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.15 | $-0.04 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $235.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $132.7M | $232.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $77.5M | $225.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $105.5M | $273.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $147.7M | $211.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $106.8M | $223.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $72.6M | $204.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $86.0M | $248.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | $-2.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-30.2M | $-15.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-14.4M | $-12.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.4M | $16.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.3M | $-19.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.1M | $-17.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-11.1M | $-17.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.8M | $-10.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | 99.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 26.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 27.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 31.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 27.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 27.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 25.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 29.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | 72.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | -11.8% | -4.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -10.1% | -3.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.7% | 8.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 24.2% | -8.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.5% | -5.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -6.5% | -6.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.4% | -3.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | -1.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | -22.8% | -6.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -18.6% | -5.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.3% | 6.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.4% | -9.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.8% | -7.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -15.3% | -8.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -3.3% | -4.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | $-0.04 | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.15 | $-0.26 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.07 | $-0.21 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.01 | $0.28 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.08 | $-0.33 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.01 | $-0.30 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.05 | $-0.30 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.03 | $-0.18 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $100.9M | $331.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $591.5M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $338.8M | $1.5B |
| Total Assets | $1.2B | $2.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.40× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $331.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $100.9M | $335.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $95.4M | $304.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $156.4M | $309.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $276.8M | $269.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $194.8M | $242.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $188.9M | $158.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $193.2M | $180.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | $591.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 25 | $338.8M | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $369.5M | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $389.4M | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $392.1M | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $385.9M | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $391.1M | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $407.6M | $1.5B |
| Q1 26 | — | $2.5B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $2.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $2.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $2.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.0B | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $2.4B |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.40× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $12.3M | $6.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $11.7M | $-1.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 8.8% | -0.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.5% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $41.4M | $73.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $6.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | $12.3M | $51.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.8M | $2.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.9M | $38.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.6M | $30.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $20.6M | $85.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.1M | $-14.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.8M | $71.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | $-1.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $11.7M | $45.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5M | $-4.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.8M | $34.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.4M | $24.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $19.9M | $81.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.0M | $-20.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.6M | $61.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | -0.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | 8.8% | 19.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.9% | -1.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.0% | 12.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.4% | 11.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 18.6% | 36.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.4% | -10.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.2% | 24.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.5% | 2.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.4% | 2.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.1% | 1.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.1% | 2.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.7% | 1.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.1% | 3.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.2% | 4.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.33× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.82× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.04× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
EEX
| Connections Segment | $121.9M | 92% |
| Commerce Segment | $5.5M | 4% |
| Content | $5.3M | 4% |
MRCY
Segment breakdown not available.
