vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Emerald Holding, Inc. (EEX) and PROCEPT BioRobotics Corp (PRCT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Emerald Holding, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($132.7M vs $83.1M, roughly 1.6× PROCEPT BioRobotics Corp). Emerald Holding, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -22.8% vs -38.1%, a 15.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Emerald Holding, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (24.3% vs 20.2%). Over the past eight quarters, PROCEPT BioRobotics Corp's revenue compounded faster (24.8% CAGR vs -0.3%).
TVS Emerald Haven Realty Limited is an Indian real estate development company headquartered in Chennai, Tamil Nadu. A subsidiary of TVS Holdings, it specializes in sustainable residential communities and urban development projects.
PROCEPT BioRobotics Corp is a medical tech firm developing and commercializing robotic surgical solutions for urological care. Its flagship AquaBeam system provides image-guided minimally invasive therapy for benign prostatic hyperplasia, serving providers and patients across North America, Europe and global markets.
EEX vs PRCT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $132.7M | $83.1M |
| Net Profit | $-30.2M | $-31.6M |
| Gross Margin | — | 64.9% |
| Operating Margin | -11.8% | -4.1% |
| Net Margin | -22.8% | -38.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 24.3% | 20.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -692.2% | -27.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.15 | $-0.56 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $83.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $132.7M | $76.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $77.5M | $83.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $105.5M | $79.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $147.7M | $69.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $106.8M | $68.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $72.6M | $58.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $86.0M | $53.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | $-31.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-30.2M | $-29.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-14.4M | $-21.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.4M | $-19.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.3M | $-24.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.1M | $-18.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-11.1M | $-21.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.8M | $-25.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | 64.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 60.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 64.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 65.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 63.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 64.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 63.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 59.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | -4.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | -11.8% | -40.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -10.1% | -27.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.7% | -28.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 24.2% | -39.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.5% | -28.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -6.5% | -38.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.4% | -50.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | -38.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | -22.8% | -39.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -18.6% | -25.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.3% | -24.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.4% | -35.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.8% | -27.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -15.3% | -35.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -3.3% | -48.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | $-0.56 | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.15 | $-0.54 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.07 | $-0.38 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.01 | $-0.35 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.08 | $-0.45 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.01 | $-0.34 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.05 | $-0.40 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.03 | $-0.50 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $100.9M | $245.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $51.7M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $338.8M | $347.7M |
| Total Assets | $1.2B | $487.1M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.15× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $245.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $100.9M | $286.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $95.4M | $294.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $156.4M | $302.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $276.8M | $316.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $194.8M | $333.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $188.9M | $196.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $193.2M | $214.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | $51.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $51.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $51.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $51.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $51.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $51.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $51.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $51.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | $347.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | $338.8M | $365.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $369.5M | $380.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $389.4M | $385.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $392.1M | $389.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $385.9M | $402.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $391.1M | $241.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $407.6M | $251.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | $487.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $508.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $511.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $513.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $519.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.0B | $534.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $374.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $374.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.15× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.14× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.14× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.13× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.13× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.13× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.21× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.20× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $12.3M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $11.7M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 8.8% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.5% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $41.4M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $12.3M | $-10.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.8M | $-6.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.9M | $-15.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.6M | $-17.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $20.6M | $-32.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.1M | $-18.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.8M | $-15.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $11.7M | $-12.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5M | $-9.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.8M | $-17.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.4M | $-18.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $19.9M | $-33.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.0M | $-19.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.6M | $-16.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 8.8% | -15.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.9% | -11.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.0% | -22.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.4% | -27.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 18.6% | -49.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.4% | -32.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.2% | -31.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.5% | 2.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.4% | 3.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.1% | 3.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.1% | 2.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.7% | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.1% | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.2% | 2.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.82× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.04× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
EEX
| Connections Segment | $121.9M | 92% |
| Commerce Segment | $5.5M | 4% |
| Content | $5.3M | 4% |
PRCT
| Handpieces and other consumables | $43.0M | 52% |
| System sales and rentals | $23.4M | 28% |
| Other | $11.1M | 13% |
| Service | $5.6M | 7% |