vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Emerald Holding, Inc. (EEX) and VICOR CORP (VICR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Emerald Holding, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($132.7M vs $113.0M, roughly 1.2× VICOR CORP). VICOR CORP runs the higher net margin — 18.3% vs -22.8%, a 41.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Emerald Holding, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (24.3% vs 20.2%). Over the past eight quarters, VICOR CORP's revenue compounded faster (14.7% CAGR vs -0.3%).
TVS Emerald Haven Realty Limited is an Indian real estate development company headquartered in Chennai, Tamil Nadu. A subsidiary of TVS Holdings, it specializes in sustainable residential communities and urban development projects.
Vicor Corporation is a manufacturer of power modules headquartered in Andover, Massachusetts.
EEX vs VICR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $132.7M | $113.0M |
| Net Profit | $-30.2M | $20.7M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -11.8% | 59.7% |
| Net Margin | -22.8% | 18.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 24.3% | 20.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -692.2% | 713.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.15 | $0.44 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $113.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $132.7M | $107.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $77.5M | $110.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $105.5M | $96.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $147.7M | $94.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $106.8M | $96.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $72.6M | $93.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $86.0M | $85.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | $20.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-30.2M | $46.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-14.4M | $28.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.4M | $41.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.3M | $2.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.1M | $10.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-11.1M | $11.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.8M | $-1.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 55.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 57.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 95.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 47.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 52.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 49.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 49.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | 59.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | -11.8% | 14.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -10.1% | 18.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.7% | 47.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 24.2% | -0.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.5% | 9.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -6.5% | 5.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.4% | 0.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | 18.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | -22.8% | 43.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -18.6% | 25.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.3% | 42.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.4% | 2.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.8% | 10.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -15.3% | 12.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -3.3% | -1.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.44 | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.15 | $1.01 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.07 | $0.63 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.01 | $0.91 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.08 | $0.06 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.01 | $0.24 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.05 | $0.26 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.03 | $-0.03 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $100.9M | $404.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $338.8M | $754.1M |
| Total Assets | $1.2B | $804.9M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $404.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $100.9M | $402.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $95.4M | $362.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $156.4M | $338.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $276.8M | $296.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $194.8M | $277.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $188.9M | $267.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $193.2M | $251.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | $754.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $338.8M | $711.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $369.5M | $630.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $389.4M | $608.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $392.1M | $580.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $385.9M | $570.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $391.1M | $554.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $407.6M | $537.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | $804.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $785.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $710.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $693.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $665.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.0B | $641.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $632.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $613.2M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $12.3M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $11.7M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 8.8% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.5% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $41.4M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $12.3M | $15.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.8M | $38.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.9M | $65.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.6M | $20.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $20.6M | $10.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.1M | $22.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.8M | $15.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $11.7M | $10.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5M | $34.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.8M | $59.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.4M | $15.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $19.9M | $8.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.0M | $14.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.6M | $9.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 8.8% | 9.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.9% | 31.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.0% | 61.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.4% | 16.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 18.6% | 8.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.4% | 15.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.2% | 11.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.5% | 5.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.4% | 3.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.1% | 6.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.1% | 4.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.7% | 1.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.1% | 9.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.2% | 7.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.34× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.36× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.58× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.82× | 7.93× | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.04× | 0.99× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.95× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
EEX
| Connections Segment | $121.9M | 92% |
| Commerce Segment | $5.5M | 4% |
| Content | $5.3M | 4% |
VICR
| Product revenue | $98.0M | 87% |
| Royalty revenue | $15.0M | 13% |
