vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Ellington Financial Inc. (EFC) and Logistic Properties of the Americas (LPA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Ellington Financial Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($78.2M vs $50.1M, roughly 1.6× Logistic Properties of the Americas). Logistic Properties of the Americas runs the higher net margin — 32.1% vs 28.9%, a 3.2% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Ellington Management Group is an American hedge fund firm. As of June 2019, the firm was reportedly managing $8.5 billion in structured products and other credit instruments.
Logistic Properties of the Americas is a specialized industrial real estate firm that acquires, develops and manages logistics properties across North, Central and South America. Its portfolio includes distribution centers, warehouses and last-mile delivery facilities, serving e-commerce, retail, manufacturing and third-party logistics clients.
EFC vs LPA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $78.2M | $50.1M |
| Net Profit | $22.6M | $16.1M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 7.4% | 81.7% |
| Net Margin | 28.9% | 32.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 8.7% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | -26.2% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.10 | $0.33 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $78.2M | $50.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $82.8M | $32.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $92.5M | $21.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $82.9M | $10.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $72.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $67.0M | $19.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $91.2M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $75.5M | $9.2M |
| Q4 25 | $22.6M | $16.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $29.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $42.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $31.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $30.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $16.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $52.3M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $26.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | 7.4% | 81.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 31.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 38.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 37.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 28.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 24.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 52.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 42.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | 28.9% | 32.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 35.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 46.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 38.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 42.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 24.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 57.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 35.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | $0.10 | $0.33 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.29 | $0.09 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.45 | $-0.06 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.35 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.23 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.19 | $-1.26 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.62 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.32 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $201.9M | $27.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $296.8M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.8B | $324.6M |
| Total Assets | $19.4B | $700.8M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.91× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $201.9M | $27.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $184.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $211.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $203.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $192.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $217.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $198.5M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $187.5M | $1.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | $296.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.8B | $324.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.5B | — |
| Q4 25 | $19.4B | $700.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $17.8B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $17.1B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $16.6B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $16.3B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $16.0B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.1B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $15.1B | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.91× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-925.5M | $21.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $21.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 42.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.0% | 0.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -40.92× | 1.34× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $12.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-925.5M | $21.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-290.4M | $14.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-210.5M | $7.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-126.4M | $4.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-430.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-141.7M | $8.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-88.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-59.5M | $4.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | $21.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-7.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-3.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $966.4K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-2.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $218.9K |
| Q4 25 | — | 42.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -22.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -14.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 9.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -12.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.4% |
| Q4 25 | 0.0% | 0.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 66.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 47.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 32.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.0% | 55.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.0% | 50.0% |
| Q4 25 | -40.92× | 1.34× | ||
| Q3 25 | -9.84× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -4.90× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -3.99× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -14.04× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -8.76× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.69× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -2.21× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
