vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of EASTGROUP PROPERTIES INC (EGP) and KADANT INC (KAI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

KADANT INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($271.6M vs $190.3M, roughly 1.4× EASTGROUP PROPERTIES INC). EASTGROUP PROPERTIES INC runs the higher net margin — 49.7% vs 10.2%, a 39.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, EASTGROUP PROPERTIES INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (9.1% vs -0.0%). EASTGROUP PROPERTIES INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($126.7M vs $44.1M). Over the past eight quarters, EASTGROUP PROPERTIES INC's revenue compounded faster (9.4% CAGR vs 6.7%).

Genpact Ltd. is an American information technology services, consulting, and outsourcing company headquartered in New York City, New York. Founded in Gurgaon, India, and legally domiciled in Bermuda, Genpact employs more than 125,000 people and provides services to clients in over 30 countries worldwide. Genpact is listed on the NYSE and generated revenues of US$4.48 billion in 2023.

Kadant Inc. is a company that was established in 1991, as a partly privately owned subsidiary of Thermo Electron, and partly publicly traded company, and was fully spun out and renamed Kadant in 2001. The company supports papermaking, paper recycling, wood processing, material handling, and other processing industries. Kadant is a multi-national corporation with operations in Asia, Europe, North America, and South America.

EGP vs KAI — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
KAI
KAI
1.4× larger
KAI
$271.6M
$190.3M
EGP
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
EGP
EGP
+9.1% gap
EGP
9.1%
-0.0%
KAI
Higher net margin
EGP
EGP
39.5% more per $
EGP
49.7%
10.2%
KAI
More free cash flow
EGP
EGP
$82.7M more FCF
EGP
$126.7M
$44.1M
KAI
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
EGP
EGP
Annualised
EGP
9.4%
6.7%
KAI

Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2025

Metric
EGP
EGP
KAI
KAI
Revenue
$190.3M
$271.6M
Net Profit
$94.6M
$27.7M
Gross Margin
45.2%
Operating Margin
15.7%
Net Margin
49.7%
10.2%
Revenue YoY
9.1%
-0.0%
Net Profit YoY
59.2%
-12.2%
EPS (diluted)
$1.77
$2.35

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
EGP
EGP
KAI
KAI
Q1 26
$190.3M
Q4 25
$187.5M
Q3 25
$182.1M
$271.6M
Q2 25
$177.3M
$255.3M
Q1 25
$174.4M
$239.2M
Q4 24
$164.0M
$258.0M
Q3 24
$162.9M
$271.6M
Q2 24
$159.1M
$274.8M
Net Profit
EGP
EGP
KAI
KAI
Q1 26
$94.6M
Q4 25
$67.8M
Q3 25
$67.0M
$27.7M
Q2 25
$63.3M
$26.2M
Q1 25
$59.4M
$24.1M
Q4 24
$58.7M
$24.0M
Q3 24
$55.2M
$31.6M
Q2 24
$55.3M
$31.3M
Gross Margin
EGP
EGP
KAI
KAI
Q1 26
Q4 25
Q3 25
45.2%
Q2 25
45.9%
Q1 25
46.1%
Q4 24
43.4%
Q3 24
44.7%
Q2 24
44.4%
Operating Margin
EGP
EGP
KAI
KAI
Q1 26
Q4 25
Q3 25
15.7%
Q2 25
15.4%
Q1 25
14.9%
Q4 24
14.3%
Q3 24
18.0%
Q2 24
17.6%
Net Margin
EGP
EGP
KAI
KAI
Q1 26
49.7%
Q4 25
36.1%
Q3 25
36.8%
10.2%
Q2 25
35.7%
10.2%
Q1 25
34.1%
10.1%
Q4 24
35.8%
9.3%
Q3 24
33.9%
11.6%
Q2 24
34.8%
11.4%
EPS (diluted)
EGP
EGP
KAI
KAI
Q1 26
$1.77
Q4 25
$1.27
Q3 25
$1.26
$2.35
Q2 25
$1.20
$2.22
Q1 25
$1.14
$2.04
Q4 24
$1.17
$2.04
Q3 24
$1.13
$2.68
Q2 24
$1.14
$2.66

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
EGP
EGP
KAI
KAI
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$31.4M
$124.5M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$1.6B
$254.6M
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$3.6B
$949.8M
Total Assets
$5.5B
$1.5B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.45×
0.27×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
EGP
EGP
KAI
KAI
Q1 26
$31.4M
Q4 25
$1.0M
Q3 25
$3.0M
$124.5M
Q2 25
$32.9M
$95.3M
Q1 25
$20.5M
$91.7M
Q4 24
$17.5M
$94.7M
Q3 24
$17.0M
$88.4M
Q2 24
$39.4M
$73.8M
Total Debt
EGP
EGP
KAI
KAI
Q1 26
$1.6B
Q4 25
Q3 25
$1.4B
$254.6M
Q2 25
$1.5B
$245.7M
Q1 25
$1.5B
$273.5M
Q4 24
$1.5B
$285.2M
Q3 24
$1.6B
$323.2M
Q2 24
$1.7B
$342.0M
Stockholders' Equity
EGP
EGP
KAI
KAI
Q1 26
$3.6B
Q4 25
$3.5B
Q3 25
$3.5B
$949.8M
Q2 25
$3.4B
$926.0M
Q1 25
$3.3B
$876.0M
Q4 24
$3.3B
$847.1M
Q3 24
$2.8B
$851.7M
Q2 24
$2.8B
$807.7M
Total Assets
EGP
EGP
KAI
KAI
Q1 26
$5.5B
Q4 25
$5.4B
Q3 25
$5.4B
$1.5B
Q2 25
$5.2B
$1.5B
Q1 25
$5.1B
$1.4B
Q4 24
$5.1B
$1.4B
Q3 24
$4.8B
$1.5B
Q2 24
$4.7B
$1.5B
Debt / Equity
EGP
EGP
KAI
KAI
Q1 26
0.45×
Q4 25
Q3 25
0.41×
0.27×
Q2 25
0.43×
0.27×
Q1 25
0.43×
0.31×
Q4 24
0.46×
0.34×
Q3 24
0.57×
0.38×
Q2 24
0.60×
0.42×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
EGP
EGP
KAI
KAI
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$142.3M
$47.3M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$126.7M
$44.1M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
66.6%
16.2%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
8.2%
1.2%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
1.50×
1.70×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$771.1M
$145.9M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
EGP
EGP
KAI
KAI
Q1 26
$142.3M
Q4 25
$480.7M
Q3 25
$138.9M
$47.3M
Q2 25
$143.4M
$40.5M
Q1 25
$133.7M
$22.8M
Q4 24
$416.6M
$51.9M
Q3 24
$122.9M
$52.5M
Q2 24
$122.9M
$28.1M
Free Cash Flow
EGP
EGP
KAI
KAI
Q1 26
$126.7M
Q4 25
$404.9M
Q3 25
$120.3M
$44.1M
Q2 25
$119.2M
$36.5M
Q1 25
$113.9M
$19.0M
Q4 24
$357.3M
$46.3M
Q3 24
$108.5M
$48.3M
Q2 24
$102.8M
$23.1M
FCF Margin
EGP
EGP
KAI
KAI
Q1 26
66.6%
Q4 25
216.0%
Q3 25
66.0%
16.2%
Q2 25
67.2%
14.3%
Q1 25
65.3%
7.9%
Q4 24
217.8%
17.9%
Q3 24
66.6%
17.8%
Q2 24
64.6%
8.4%
Capex Intensity
EGP
EGP
KAI
KAI
Q1 26
8.2%
Q4 25
40.5%
Q3 25
10.2%
1.2%
Q2 25
13.7%
1.6%
Q1 25
11.3%
1.6%
Q4 24
36.1%
2.2%
Q3 24
8.9%
1.5%
Q2 24
12.6%
1.8%
Cash Conversion
EGP
EGP
KAI
KAI
Q1 26
1.50×
Q4 25
7.10×
Q3 25
2.07×
1.70×
Q2 25
2.26×
1.55×
Q1 25
2.25×
0.95×
Q4 24
7.10×
2.16×
Q3 24
2.23×
1.66×
Q2 24
2.22×
0.90×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

EGP
EGP

Segment breakdown not available.

KAI
KAI

Flow Control$94.8M35%
Capital$83.2M31%
Material Handling Systems$70.3M26%
Transferred Over Time$17.1M6%
Other$6.1M2%

Related Comparisons