vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Enhabit, Inc. (EHAB) and INSTEEL INDUSTRIES INC (IIIN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Enhabit, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($270.4M vs $159.9M, roughly 1.7× INSTEEL INDUSTRIES INC). INSTEEL INDUSTRIES INC runs the higher net margin — 4.7% vs -14.3%, a 19.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, INSTEEL INDUSTRIES INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (23.3% vs 4.7%). Enhabit, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($3.3M vs $-2.2M). Over the past eight quarters, INSTEEL INDUSTRIES INC's revenue compounded faster (12.0% CAGR vs 1.5%).
Enhabit, Inc., is a Dallas, Texas-based provider of home health and hospice services. The company operates 255 home health and 110 hospice locations in 34 states with a concentration in Texas, Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Oklahoma and Mississippi. Enhabit is the fourth-largest provider of home health services in the United States and is a leading provider of hospice services. The company was formed in 2022 when Encompass Health spun off its home health and hospice business.
Insteel Industries Inc is a leading U.S. manufacturer of steel reinforcing products including welded wire reinforcement and steel fibers. It primarily serves non-residential construction, infrastructure, and precast concrete segments across North America, delivering high-performance reinforcement solutions for various construction projects.
EHAB vs IIIN — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $270.4M | $159.9M |
| Net Profit | $-38.7M | $7.6M |
| Gross Margin | — | 11.3% |
| Operating Margin | -12.3% | 6.0% |
| Net Margin | -14.3% | 4.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 4.7% | 23.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | 15.9% | 602.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.76 | $0.39 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $270.4M | $159.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $263.6M | $177.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $266.1M | $179.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $259.9M | $160.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $258.2M | $129.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $253.6M | $134.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $260.6M | $145.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $262.4M | $127.4M |
| Q4 25 | $-38.7M | $7.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.1M | $14.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.2M | $15.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.8M | $10.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-46.0M | $1.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-110.2M | $4.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-200.0K | $6.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $200.0K | $6.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | 11.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 16.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 17.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 15.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 7.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 9.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 10.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 12.3% |
| Q4 25 | -12.3% | 6.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.4% | 10.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.3% | 11.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.1% | 8.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -16.0% | 1.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -38.6% | 4.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.3% | 6.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.9% | 7.0% |
| Q4 25 | -14.3% | 4.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.2% | 8.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.0% | 8.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.8% | 6.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -17.8% | 0.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -43.5% | 3.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.1% | 4.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.1% | 5.4% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.76 | $0.39 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.22 | $0.74 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.10 | $0.78 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.35 | $0.52 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.92 | $0.06 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.20 | $0.24 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.00 | $0.34 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.01 | $0.35 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $43.6M | $15.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $426.0M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $534.0M | $358.8M |
| Total Assets | $1.2B | $456.1M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.80× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $43.6M | $15.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $56.9M | $38.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $37.1M | $53.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $39.5M | $28.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $28.4M | $36.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $45.7M | $111.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $28.5M | $97.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $36.5M | $83.9M |
| Q4 25 | $426.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $441.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $456.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $467.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $492.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $502.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $512.7M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $526.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | $534.0M | $358.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $566.8M | $371.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $552.4M | $356.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $543.2M | $341.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $523.5M | $331.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $566.1M | $350.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $674.3M | $346.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $672.3M | $340.6M |
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $456.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $462.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $471.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $421.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $404.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.3B | $422.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4B | $414.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.4B | $397.2M |
| Q4 25 | 0.80× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.78× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.83× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.86× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.94× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.89× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.76× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.78× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $4.4M | $-701.0K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $3.3M | $-2.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 1.2% | -1.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.4% | 0.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | -0.09× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $65.8M | $439.0K |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $4.4M | $-701.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $37.8M | $-17.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.6M | $28.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.9M | $-3.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-4.1M | $19.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $28.4M | $16.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.6M | $18.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $17.3M | $1.4M |
| Q4 25 | $3.3M | $-2.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $36.2M | $-18.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.7M | $26.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.6M | $-5.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-4.7M | $16.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $27.7M | $14.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.9M | $15.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $15.5M | $-580.0K |
| Q4 25 | 1.2% | -1.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.7% | -10.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.3% | 15.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.8% | -3.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -1.8% | 12.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.9% | 10.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.4% | 10.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.9% | -0.5% |
| Q4 25 | 0.4% | 0.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.6% | 1.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.7% | 0.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.1% | 1.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.2% | 2.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.3% | 1.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.3% | 2.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.7% | 1.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | -0.09× | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.41× | -1.17× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.04× | 1.88× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.01× | -0.32× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 17.56× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.48× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.86× | ||
| Q1 24 | 86.50× | 0.20× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
EHAB
| Third Party Payor Medicare | $111.6M | 41% |
| Third Party Payor Medicare Advantage | $67.5M | 25% |
| Hospice Segment | $63.6M | 24% |
| Third Party Payor Managed Care | $24.9M | 9% |
| Third Party Payor Medicaid | $1.7M | 1% |
IIIN
| Welded Wire Reinforcement | $108.4M | 68% |
| PC Strand | $51.6M | 32% |
