vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Enhabit, Inc. (EHAB) and Proto Labs Inc (PRLB). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Enhabit, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($270.4M vs $136.5M, roughly 2.0× Proto Labs Inc). On growth, Proto Labs Inc posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (12.1% vs 4.7%). Proto Labs Inc produced more free cash flow last quarter ($8.4M vs $3.3M). Over the past eight quarters, Proto Labs Inc's revenue compounded faster (3.3% CAGR vs 1.5%).
Enhabit, Inc., is a Dallas, Texas-based provider of home health and hospice services. The company operates 255 home health and 110 hospice locations in 34 states with a concentration in Texas, Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Oklahoma and Mississippi. Enhabit is the fourth-largest provider of home health services in the United States and is a leading provider of hospice services. The company was formed in 2022 when Encompass Health spun off its home health and hospice business.
Protolabs is a company that provides rapid manufacturing of 3D printed, CNC-machined, sheet metal, and injection-molded custom parts for prototyping and production. Markets like medical devices, aerospace, electronics, appliances, automotive and consumer products use these parts. Protolabs' headquarters are located in Maple Plain, Minnesota, with Minnesota-based manufacturing facilities in Plymouth, Brooklyn Park, and Rosemount, along with additional facilities in Nashua, New Hampshire and Ca...
EHAB vs PRLB — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $270.4M | $136.5M |
| Net Profit | $-38.7M | — |
| Gross Margin | — | 44.2% |
| Operating Margin | -12.3% | 5.0% |
| Net Margin | -14.3% | — |
| Revenue YoY | 4.7% | 12.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | 15.9% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.76 | $0.25 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $270.4M | $136.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $263.6M | $135.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $266.1M | $135.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $259.9M | $126.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $258.2M | $121.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $253.6M | $125.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $260.6M | $125.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $262.4M | $127.9M |
| Q4 25 | $-38.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.1M | $7.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.2M | $4.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.8M | $3.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-46.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-110.2M | $7.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-200.0K | $4.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $200.0K | $5.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | 44.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 45.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 44.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 44.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 42.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 45.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 45.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 44.9% |
| Q4 25 | -12.3% | 5.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.4% | 6.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.3% | 3.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.1% | 3.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -16.0% | -1.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -38.6% | 6.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.3% | 4.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.9% | 5.3% |
| Q4 25 | -14.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.2% | 5.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.0% | 3.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.8% | 2.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -17.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -43.5% | 5.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.1% | 3.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.1% | 4.1% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.76 | $0.25 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.22 | $0.30 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.10 | $0.18 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.35 | $0.15 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.92 | $-0.01 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.20 | $0.29 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.00 | $0.18 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.01 | $0.20 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $43.6M | $128.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $426.0M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $534.0M | $673.9M |
| Total Assets | $1.2B | $763.4M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.80× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $43.6M | $128.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $56.9M | $119.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $37.1M | $103.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $39.5M | $96.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $28.4M | $103.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $45.7M | $100.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $28.5M | $112.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $36.5M | $109.7M |
| Q4 25 | $426.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $441.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $456.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $467.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $492.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $502.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $512.7M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $526.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | $534.0M | $673.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $566.8M | $664.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $552.4M | $664.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $543.2M | $656.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $523.5M | $670.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $566.1M | $680.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $674.3M | $685.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $672.3M | $687.3M |
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $763.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $756.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $743.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $737.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $743.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.3B | $753.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4B | $758.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.4B | $769.8M |
| Q4 25 | 0.80× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.78× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.83× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.86× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.94× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.89× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.76× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.78× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $4.4M | $16.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $3.3M | $8.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 1.2% | 6.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.4% | 5.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $65.8M | $59.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $4.4M | $16.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $37.8M | $29.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.6M | $10.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.9M | $18.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-4.1M | $17.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $28.4M | $24.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.6M | $14.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $17.3M | $21.3M |
| Q4 25 | $3.3M | $8.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $36.2M | $25.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.7M | $9.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.6M | $17.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-4.7M | $16.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $27.7M | $23.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.9M | $10.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $15.5M | $18.8M |
| Q4 25 | 1.2% | 6.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.7% | 18.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.3% | 6.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.8% | 13.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -1.8% | 13.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.9% | 18.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.4% | 8.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.9% | 14.7% |
| Q4 25 | 0.4% | 5.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.6% | 3.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.7% | 1.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.1% | 1.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.2% | 0.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.3% | 1.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.3% | 3.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.7% | 2.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.41× | 4.03× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.04× | 2.39× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.01× | 5.11× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.44× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.18× | ||
| Q1 24 | 86.50× | 4.05× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
EHAB
| Third Party Payor Medicare | $111.6M | 41% |
| Third Party Payor Medicare Advantage | $67.5M | 25% |
| Hospice Segment | $63.6M | 24% |
| Third Party Payor Managed Care | $24.9M | 9% |
| Third Party Payor Medicaid | $1.7M | 1% |
PRLB
| CNC Machining Firstcut | $65.5M | 48% |
| Injection Molding Protomold | $47.6M | 35% |
| Three D Printing Fineline | $18.8M | 14% |
| Sheet Metal | $4.4M | 3% |
