vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Encompass Health Corp (EHC) and Garrett Motion Inc. (GTX). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Encompass Health Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.5B vs $891.0M, roughly 1.7× Garrett Motion Inc.). Encompass Health Corp runs the higher net margin — 9.5% vs 9.4%, a 0.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Encompass Health Corp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (9.9% vs 5.6%). Encompass Health Corp produced more free cash flow last quarter ($116.7M vs $78.0M). Over the past eight quarters, Encompass Health Corp's revenue compounded faster (8.3% CAGR vs -1.3%).
Encompass Health Corporation, formerly Amcare and HealthSouth, based in Birmingham, Alabama, is the United States's largest provider of inpatient rehabilitative services, offering facility-based care through its network of 173 inpatient rehabilitation hospitals located in 39 states and Puerto Rico. Encompass Health's hospitals focus on providing rehabilitative treatment and care to patients who are recovering from stroke and other neurological disorders, cardiac and pulmonary conditions, brai...
Garrett Motion Inc., formerly Honeywell Transportation Systems and Honeywell Turbo Technologies, is an American company primarily involved in engineering, development and manufacturing of turbochargers and related forced induction systems for ground vehicles from small passenger cars to large trucks and industrial equipment and construction machinery. It originated as part of Garrett AiResearch's Industrial Division in Phoenix, Arizona, in 1954, after which they entered a contract to provide ...
EHC vs GTX — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.5B | $891.0M |
| Net Profit | $146.1M | $84.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | 20.8% |
| Operating Margin | 16.7% | 11.6% |
| Net Margin | 9.5% | 9.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 9.9% | 5.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 20.8% | -16.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.43 | $0.42 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | $891.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $902.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $913.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | $878.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4B | $844.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.4B | $826.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3B | $890.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.3B | $915.0M |
| Q4 25 | $146.1M | $84.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $126.5M | $77.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $142.1M | $87.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $151.5M | $62.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $120.9M | $100.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $108.2M | $52.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $114.1M | $64.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $112.5M | $66.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | 20.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 20.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 19.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 20.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 21.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 20.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 20.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 18.8% |
| Q4 25 | 16.7% | 11.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.9% | 11.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.2% | 11.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.4% | 9.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.3% | 11.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.6% | 9.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.3% | 9.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 13.6% | 8.9% |
| Q4 25 | 9.5% | 9.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.6% | 8.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.7% | 9.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.4% | 7.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.6% | 11.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.0% | 6.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.8% | 7.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.5% | 7.2% |
| Q4 25 | $1.43 | $0.42 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.24 | $0.38 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.39 | $0.42 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.48 | $0.30 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.18 | $0.46 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.06 | $0.24 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.12 | $0.28 | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.10 | $0.28 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $72.2M | $177.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $2.4B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.4B | $-802.0M |
| Total Assets | $7.1B | $2.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.00× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $72.2M | $177.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $48.7M | $230.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $99.1M | $232.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $95.8M | $130.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $85.4M | $125.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $147.8M | $96.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $154.4M | $98.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $134.4M | $196.0M |
| Q4 25 | $2.4B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.3B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.4B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.3B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.7B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.7B | — |
| Q4 25 | $2.4B | $-802.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4B | $-813.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.3B | $-812.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.2B | $-700.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.1B | $-673.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.0B | $-778.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $-725.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.7B | $-735.0M |
| Q4 25 | $7.1B | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.9B | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.8B | $2.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.6B | $2.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.5B | $2.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.5B | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.4B | $2.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.2B | $2.4B |
| Q4 25 | 1.00× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.01× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.02× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.08× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.14× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.20× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.46× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.54× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $346.0M | $99.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $116.7M | $78.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 7.6% | 8.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 14.8% | 2.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.37× | 1.18× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $439.2M | $341.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $346.0M | $99.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $270.8M | $100.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $270.2M | $158.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $288.6M | $56.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $278.8M | $131.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $267.8M | $67.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $217.4M | $126.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $238.8M | $84.0M |
| Q4 25 | $116.7M | $78.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $83.7M | $90.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $113.3M | $143.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $125.5M | $30.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $80.1M | $109.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $120.3M | $47.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $60.5M | $109.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $99.4M | $52.0M |
| Q4 25 | 7.6% | 8.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.7% | 10.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.8% | 15.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.6% | 3.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.7% | 12.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.9% | 5.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.6% | 12.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 7.6% | 5.7% |
| Q4 25 | 14.8% | 2.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.7% | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.8% | 1.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.2% | 3.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.1% | 2.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.9% | 2.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.1% | 1.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 10.6% | 3.5% |
| Q4 25 | 2.37× | 1.18× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.14× | 1.30× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.90× | 1.82× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.90× | 0.90× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.31× | 1.31× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.48× | 1.29× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.91× | 1.97× | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.12× | 1.27× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
EHC
| Medicare | $1.0B | 66% |
| Medicare Advantage | $243.1M | 16% |
| Managed Care | $160.7M | 10% |
| Medicaid | $47.0M | 3% |
| Other Income Source | $44.8M | 3% |
| Other Thirdparty Payors | $11.2M | 1% |
| Workers Compensation | $7.6M | 0% |
| Patients | $4.6M | 0% |
GTX
Segment breakdown not available.
