vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Edison International (EIX) and GE Vernova (GEV). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
GE Vernova is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($9.3B vs $5.2B, roughly 1.8× Edison International). GE Vernova runs the higher net margin — 50.9% vs 35.4%, a 15.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Edison International posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (30.8% vs 16.3%). GE Vernova produced more free cash flow last quarter ($4.8B vs $-319.0M). Over the past eight quarters, Edison International's revenue compounded faster (13.1% CAGR vs 6.7%).
Edison International is a public utility holding company based in Rosemead, California. Its subsidiaries include Southern California Edison, and unregulated non-utility business assets Edison Energy. Edison's roots trace back to Holt & Knupps, a company founded in 1886 as a provider of street lights in Visalia, California.
GE Vernova, Inc. is an energy equipment manufacturing and services company headquartered in Cambridge, Massachusetts. The company operates through three main segments: Power, which designs, manufactures, and services gas, nuclear, hydro, and steam technologies; Wind, which provides onshore and offshore wind turbines and blades; and Electrification, which offers grid solutions, power conversion, solar and storage solutions, and digital technologies for the transmission, distribution, and manag...
EIX vs GEV — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $5.2B | $9.3B |
| Net Profit | $1.8B | $4.8B |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 52.8% | — |
| Net Margin | 35.4% | 50.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 30.8% | 16.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | 443.5% | 5.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $4.78 | $17.44 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $9.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.2B | $11.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.8B | $10.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.5B | $9.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.8B | $8.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.0B | $10.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.2B | $8.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.3B | $8.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | $4.8B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.8B | $3.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $832.0M | $452.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $343.0M | $514.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | $254.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $340.0M | $484.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $516.0M | $-96.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $439.0M | $1.3B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 21.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 19.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 20.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 18.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 20.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 12.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 20.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 52.8% | 5.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 24.9% | 3.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.1% | 4.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 56.0% | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.8% | 5.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.1% | -4.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.8% | 6.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | 50.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | 35.4% | 33.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.5% | 4.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.6% | 5.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 37.7% | 3.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.5% | 4.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.9% | -1.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.1% | 15.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | $17.44 | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.78 | $13.28 | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.16 | $1.64 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.89 | $1.86 | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.72 | $0.91 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.89 | $1.75 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.32 | $-0.35 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.13 | $4.65 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $158.0M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $38.0B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $17.6B | — |
| Total Assets | $94.0B | — |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 2.16× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $158.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $364.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $140.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $193.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $200.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $465.0M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $38.0B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $36.4B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $37.7B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $38.4B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $35.6B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $34.9B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $34.8B | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $17.6B | $11.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $17.2B | $8.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $16.7B | $8.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $16.6B | $8.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.6B | $9.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $15.7B | $9.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.4B | $9.1B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $94.0B | $63.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $90.5B | $54.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $88.8B | $53.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $88.4B | $51.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $85.6B | $51.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $84.7B | $50.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $84.8B | $48.1B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.16× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.12× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.26× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.31× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.29× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.23× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.26× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $1.6B | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-319.0M | $4.8B |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -6.1% | 51.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 36.3% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.85× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-715.0M | $7.5B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.6B | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.1B | $980.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $882.0M | $367.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $921.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.5B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $329.0M | $979.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $4.8B | ||
| Q4 25 | $-319.0M | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $618.0M | $733.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-830.0M | $194.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-184.0M | $975.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-326.0M | $571.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $961.0M | $968.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.1B | $822.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | 51.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | -6.1% | 16.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.7% | 7.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -18.3% | 2.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -4.8% | 12.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -8.2% | 5.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.5% | 10.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -25.2% | 10.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 36.3% | 6.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 26.2% | 2.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 37.7% | 1.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 36.9% | 2.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 37.6% | 3.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 29.1% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 32.8% | 1.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.85× | 0.68× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.55× | 2.17× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.57× | 0.71× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.85× | 4.57× | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.44× | 1.90× | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.79× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.75× | 0.76× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
EIX
| Commercial | $2.2B | 43% |
| Residential | $1.2B | 23% |
| Other | $966.0M | 19% |
| Other Operating Revenue | $802.0M | 15% |
GEV
| Organic revenues | $8.6B | 92% |
| Other | $752.0M | 8% |
