vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Edison International (EIX) and LEAR CORP (LEA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
LEAR CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($6.0B vs $5.2B, roughly 1.1× Edison International). Edison International runs the higher net margin — 35.4% vs 1.4%, a 34.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Edison International posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (30.8% vs 4.8%). LEAR CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($281.1M vs $-319.0M). Over the past eight quarters, Edison International's revenue compounded faster (13.1% CAGR vs -0.1%).
Edison International is a public utility holding company based in Rosemead, California. Its subsidiaries include Southern California Edison, and unregulated non-utility business assets Edison Energy. Edison's roots trace back to Holt & Knupps, a company founded in 1886 as a provider of street lights in Visalia, California.
Lear Corporation is an American company that manufactures automotive seating and electrical systems. In 2019, it ranked #147 and in 2018, it ranked #148 on the Fortune 500 list.
EIX vs LEA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $5.2B | $6.0B |
| Net Profit | $1.8B | $82.7M |
| Gross Margin | — | 5.7% |
| Operating Margin | 52.8% | 2.6% |
| Net Margin | 35.4% | 1.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 30.8% | 4.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | 443.5% | -6.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $4.78 | $1.58 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $5.2B | $6.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.8B | $5.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.5B | $6.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.8B | $5.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.0B | $5.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.2B | $5.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.3B | $6.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.1B | $6.0B |
| Q4 25 | $1.8B | $82.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $832.0M | $108.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $343.0M | $165.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | $80.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $340.0M | $88.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $516.0M | $135.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $439.0M | $173.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-11.0M | $109.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | 5.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 6.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 7.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 6.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 6.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 7.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 7.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 6.6% |
| Q4 25 | 52.8% | 2.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 24.9% | 3.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.1% | 4.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 56.0% | 3.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.8% | 3.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.1% | 3.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.8% | 4.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.0% | 3.3% |
| Q4 25 | 35.4% | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.5% | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.6% | 2.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 37.7% | 1.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.5% | 1.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.9% | 2.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.1% | 2.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.3% | 1.8% |
| Q4 25 | $4.78 | $1.58 | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.16 | $2.02 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.89 | $3.06 | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.72 | $1.49 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.89 | $1.64 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.32 | $2.41 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.13 | $3.02 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.03 | $1.90 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $158.0M | $1.0B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $38.0B | $2.7B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $17.6B | $5.0B |
| Total Assets | $94.0B | $14.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 2.16× | 0.54× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $158.0M | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $364.0M | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $140.0M | $887.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | $779.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $193.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $200.0M | $763.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $465.0M | $950.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $992.0M | $930.4M |
| Q4 25 | $38.0B | $2.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $36.4B | $2.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $37.7B | $2.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $38.4B | $2.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $35.6B | $2.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $34.9B | $2.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $34.8B | $2.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $34.7B | $2.7B |
| Q4 25 | $17.6B | $5.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $17.2B | $5.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $16.7B | $5.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $16.6B | $4.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.6B | $4.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $15.7B | $4.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.4B | $4.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $15.2B | $4.9B |
| Q4 25 | $94.0B | $14.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $90.5B | $15.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $88.8B | $15.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $88.4B | $14.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $85.6B | $14.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $84.7B | $14.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $84.8B | $14.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $83.6B | $14.9B |
| Q4 25 | 2.16× | 0.54× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.12× | 0.54× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.26× | 0.54× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.31× | 0.59× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.29× | 0.61× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.23× | 0.58× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.26× | 0.57× | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.29× | 0.56× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $1.6B | $475.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-319.0M | $281.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -6.1% | 4.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 36.3% | 3.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.85× | 5.75× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-715.0M | $527.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.6B | $475.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.1B | $444.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $882.0M | $296.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $-127.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $680.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.5B | $182.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $329.0M | $291.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.0B | $-34.6M |
| Q4 25 | $-319.0M | $281.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $618.0M | $307.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-830.0M | $170.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-184.0M | $-231.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-326.0M | $488.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $961.0M | $50.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.1B | $170.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-236.0M | $-148.2M |
| Q4 25 | -6.1% | 4.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.7% | 5.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -18.3% | 2.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -4.8% | -4.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -8.2% | 8.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.5% | 0.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -25.2% | 2.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -5.8% | -2.5% |
| Q4 25 | 36.3% | 3.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 26.2% | 2.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 37.7% | 2.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 36.9% | 1.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 37.6% | 3.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 29.1% | 2.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 32.8% | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 31.4% | 1.9% |
| Q4 25 | 0.85× | 5.75× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.55× | 4.11× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.57× | 1.79× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.85× | -1.58× | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.44× | 7.73× | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.79× | 1.35× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.75× | 1.68× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -0.32× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
EIX
| Commercial | $2.2B | 43% |
| Residential | $1.2B | 23% |
| Other | $966.0M | 19% |
| Other Operating Revenue | $802.0M | 15% |
LEA
| Other | $3.5B | 59% |
| Seating Segment | $1.9B | 32% |
| E Systems Segment | $520.6M | 9% |
