vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Ellomay Capital Ltd. (ELLO) and SUTRO BIOPHARMA, INC. (STRO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Ellomay Capital Ltd. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($20.1M vs $11.6M, roughly 1.7× SUTRO BIOPHARMA, INC.).

Ellomay Capital Ltd is a renewable energy enterprise focused on the development, ownership, and operation of clean power assets. Its portfolio includes solar photovoltaic projects, onshore wind farms, and pumped storage hydroelectric facilities, with core operations across Israel and key European markets, delivering low-carbon energy to both commercial and residential end consumers.

Sutro Biopharma, Inc. is a publicly traded biotechnology company headquartered in South San Francisco, California focused on clinical-stage drug discovery, development and manufacturing. Using a proprietary cell-free protein synthesis platform, Sutro is working on oncology therapeutics using protein engineering and rational design. Founded in 2003 under the name Fundamental Applied Biology, the company name changed to Sutro Biopharma in 2009. William Newell, CEO as of 2024, joined Sutro in Ja...

ELLO vs STRO — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
ELLO
ELLO
1.7× larger
ELLO
$20.1M
$11.6M
STRO

Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
ELLO
ELLO
STRO
STRO
Revenue
$20.1M
$11.6M
Net Profit
Gross Margin
12.1%
Operating Margin
-11.8%
Net Margin
Revenue YoY
-21.4%
Net Profit YoY
35.4%
EPS (diluted)

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
ELLO
ELLO
STRO
STRO
Q4 25
$11.6M
Q3 25
$9.7M
Q2 25
$20.1M
$63.7M
Q1 25
$17.4M
Q4 24
$14.8M
Q3 24
$8.5M
Q2 24
$19.5M
$25.7M
Q1 24
$13.0M
Net Profit
ELLO
ELLO
STRO
STRO
Q4 25
Q3 25
$-56.9M
Q2 25
$-11.5M
Q1 25
$-76.0M
Q4 24
$-72.4M
Q3 24
$-48.8M
Q2 24
$-48.0M
Q1 24
$-58.2M
Gross Margin
ELLO
ELLO
STRO
STRO
Q4 25
Q3 25
Q2 25
12.1%
Q1 25
Q4 24
Q3 24
Q2 24
8.7%
Q1 24
Operating Margin
ELLO
ELLO
STRO
STRO
Q4 25
Q3 25
-499.9%
Q2 25
-11.8%
-5.2%
Q1 25
-393.8%
Q4 24
-440.7%
Q3 24
-797.2%
Q2 24
-9.3%
-189.4%
Q1 24
-435.0%
Net Margin
ELLO
ELLO
STRO
STRO
Q4 25
Q3 25
-586.6%
Q2 25
-18.0%
Q1 25
-436.6%
Q4 24
-489.2%
Q3 24
-572.6%
Q2 24
-186.8%
Q1 24
-447.5%
EPS (diluted)
ELLO
ELLO
STRO
STRO
Q4 25
Q3 25
$-0.67
Q2 25
$-0.14
Q1 25
$-0.91
Q4 24
$-27.63
Q3 24
$-0.59
Q2 24
$-0.59
Q1 24
$-0.59

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
ELLO
ELLO
STRO
STRO
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$54.5M
$141.4M
Total DebtLower is stronger
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$171.5M
$-132.5M
Total Assets
$855.5M
$173.8M
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
ELLO
ELLO
STRO
STRO
Q4 25
$141.4M
Q3 25
$167.6M
Q2 25
$54.5M
$205.1M
Q1 25
$249.0M
Q4 24
$316.9M
Q3 24
$388.3M
Q2 24
$59.9M
$375.6M
Q1 24
$267.6M
Stockholders' Equity
ELLO
ELLO
STRO
STRO
Q4 25
$-132.5M
Q3 25
$-87.3M
Q2 25
$171.5M
$-32.1M
Q1 25
$-25.8M
Q4 24
$44.6M
Q3 24
$111.2M
Q2 24
$136.3M
$152.2M
Q1 24
$98.0M
Total Assets
ELLO
ELLO
STRO
STRO
Q4 25
$173.8M
Q3 25
$209.7M
Q2 25
$855.5M
$262.4M
Q1 25
$321.4M
Q4 24
$387.2M
Q3 24
$451.8M
Q2 24
$678.9M
$489.0M
Q1 24
$403.4M

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
ELLO
ELLO
STRO
STRO
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$5.1K
$-177.2M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
ELLO
ELLO
STRO
STRO
Q4 25
$-177.2M
Q3 25
$-38.2M
Q2 25
$5.1K
$-44.7M
Q1 25
$-67.9M
Q4 24
$-71.7M
Q3 24
$-64.5M
Q2 24
$468.0K
$9.5M
Q1 24
$-64.7M

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Related Comparisons