vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Elme Communities (ELME) and Information Services Group Inc. (III). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Elme Communities is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($62.1M vs $61.2M, roughly 1.0× Information Services Group Inc.). Information Services Group Inc. runs the higher net margin — 4.3% vs -198.9%, a 203.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Information Services Group Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (5.9% vs 1.7%). Elme Communities produced more free cash flow last quarter ($7.2M vs $4.3M). Over the past eight quarters, Elme Communities's revenue compounded faster (2.7% CAGR vs -2.4%).
Elme Communities is a publicly traded U.S. real estate investment trust that primarily owns, operates and develops high-quality multifamily residential communities. It focuses on key growth markets across the U.S. Mid-Atlantic and Southeast, offering affordable to mid-tier housing options for diverse renter groups.
EBSCO Information Services, headquartered in Ipswich, Massachusetts, is a division of EBSCO Industries Inc., a private company headquartered in Birmingham, Alabama. EBSCO provides products and services to libraries of many types around the world. Its products include EBSCONET, a complete e-resource management system, and EBSCOhost, which supplies a fee-based online research service with 375 full-text databases, a collection of 600,000-plus ebooks, subject indexes, point-of-care medical refere...
ELME vs III — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $62.1M | $61.2M |
| Net Profit | $-123.5M | $2.6M |
| Gross Margin | 61.1% | 44.8% |
| Operating Margin | -183.3% | 8.4% |
| Net Margin | -198.9% | 4.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 1.7% | 5.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | -4058.7% | -14.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-1.40 | $0.06 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $61.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $62.1M | $62.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $62.1M | $61.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $61.5M | $59.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $61.3M | $57.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $61.1M | $61.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $60.1M | $64.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $59.5M | $64.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | $2.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-123.5M | $3.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.6M | $2.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.7M | $1.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-3.0M | $3.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-3.0M | $1.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-3.5M | $2.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-3.6M | $-3.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | 44.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 61.1% | 42.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 63.5% | 42.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 64.2% | 43.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 62.9% | 41.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 63.5% | 40.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 63.4% | 39.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 63.5% | 36.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | 8.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -183.3% | 7.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.6% | 7.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.8% | 5.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.4% | 0.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.0% | 7.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.8% | 5.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 7.5% | -3.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | 4.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -198.9% | 4.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -5.7% | 3.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -7.6% | 2.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -4.9% | 5.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -4.9% | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -5.8% | 3.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -6.1% | -5.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.06 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.40 | $0.06 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.04 | $0.04 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.05 | $0.03 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.04 | $0.07 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.03 | $0.02 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.04 | $0.04 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.04 | $-0.07 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $7.1M | $28.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $908.9M | $94.7M |
| Total Assets | $1.7B | $211.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $28.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.1M | $28.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.8M | $25.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.4M | $20.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.1M | $23.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.8M | $9.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.6M | $11.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.2M | $14.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $94.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $908.9M | $94.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.0B | $94.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $95.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $96.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $96.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $95.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.1B | $95.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | $211.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $213.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8B | $200.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.8B | $202.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.8B | $204.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.9B | $227.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.9B | $235.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.9B | $234.2M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $15.9M | $5.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $7.2M | $4.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 11.6% | 7.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 14.0% | 1.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.94× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $86.7M | $25.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $5.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.9M | $11.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $29.8M | $11.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $16.2M | $978.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $95.2M | $6.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $20.7M | $8.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $28.9M | $2.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $21.2M | $2.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | $4.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.2M | $9.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $21.1M | $11.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.5M | $141.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $47.9M | $6.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.8M | $8.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $21.0M | $1.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.6M | $1.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | 7.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.6% | 15.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 34.1% | 18.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 17.1% | 0.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 78.1% | 10.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.4% | 13.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 34.9% | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 12.8% | 2.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.0% | 2.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.0% | 1.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.2% | 1.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 77.4% | 0.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.4% | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.1% | 1.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 22.9% | 1.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.94× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.62× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 5.46× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.66× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.15× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 7.66× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.07× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ELME
| Residential Segment | $57.7M | 93% |
| Other | $4.4M | 7% |
III
Segment breakdown not available.
