vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Elme Communities (ELME) and Ranpak Holdings Corp. (PACK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Ranpak Holdings Corp. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($93.7M vs $62.1M, roughly 1.5× Elme Communities). On growth, Ranpak Holdings Corp. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (2.3% vs 1.7%). Over the past eight quarters, Ranpak Holdings Corp.'s revenue compounded faster (13.7% CAGR vs 2.7%).
Elme Communities is a publicly traded U.S. real estate investment trust that primarily owns, operates and develops high-quality multifamily residential communities. It focuses on key growth markets across the U.S. Mid-Atlantic and Southeast, offering affordable to mid-tier housing options for diverse renter groups.
Ranpak Holdings Corp. manufactures machines and paper products used in protective paper-based packing for shipping goods and merchandise for e-commerce and industry, along with automation solutions. The company is based in Concord, Ohio, and has production facilities and offices in Reno, Nevada; Kansas City, Missouri; the Netherlands; Czech Republic; Shanghai and Singapore. The paper packaging material can be used for multiple applications like wrapping, cushioning, void fill and cold chain p...
ELME vs PACK — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $62.1M | $93.7M |
| Net Profit | $-123.5M | — |
| Gross Margin | 61.1% | 39.0% |
| Operating Margin | -183.3% | -1.0% |
| Net Margin | -198.9% | — |
| Revenue YoY | 1.7% | 2.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | -4058.7% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-1.40 | $-0.11 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $93.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $62.1M | $83.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $62.1M | $77.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $61.5M | $77.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $61.3M | $91.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $61.1M | $78.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $60.1M | $72.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $59.5M | $72.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-123.5M | $-10.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.6M | $-7.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.7M | $-10.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-3.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-3.0M | $-8.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-3.5M | $5.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-3.6M | $-8.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | 39.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 61.1% | 41.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 63.5% | 37.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 64.2% | 39.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 62.9% | 45.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 63.5% | 43.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 63.4% | 43.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 63.5% | 44.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | -1.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -183.3% | -6.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.6% | -12.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.8% | -10.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.4% | 1.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.0% | -5.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.8% | -7.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 7.5% | -6.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -198.9% | -12.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -5.7% | -9.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -7.6% | -14.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -4.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -4.9% | -10.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -5.8% | 7.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -6.1% | -11.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.11 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.40 | $-0.12 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.04 | $-0.09 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.05 | $-0.13 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.04 | $-0.13 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.03 | $-0.10 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.04 | $0.07 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.04 | $-0.10 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $7.1M | $63.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $401.9M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $908.9M | $534.9M |
| Total Assets | $1.7B | $1.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.75× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $63.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.1M | $49.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.8M | $49.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.4M | $65.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.1M | $76.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.8M | $69.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.6M | $65.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.2M | $55.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | $401.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $403.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $403.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $405.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $406.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $403.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $396.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $396.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | $534.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $908.9M | $537.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.0B | $539.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $544.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $548.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $564.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $566.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.1B | $560.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.8B | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.8B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.9B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.9B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.9B | $1.1B |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.75× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.75× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.75× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.74× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.74× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.71× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.70× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.71× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $15.9M | $19.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $7.2M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 11.6% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 14.0% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $86.7M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $19.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.9M | $8.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $29.8M | $-3.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $16.2M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $95.2M | $6.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $20.7M | $10.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $28.9M | $19.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $21.2M | $5.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $21.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $47.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $21.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 34.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 17.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 78.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 34.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 12.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 77.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.1% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 22.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.56× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ELME
| Residential Segment | $57.7M | 93% |
| Other | $4.4M | 7% |
PACK
| Other | $47.9M | 51% |
| Europe And Asia Segment | $45.8M | 49% |
