vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Elme Communities (ELME) and SILICOM LTD. (SILC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Elme Communities is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($62.1M vs $61.9M, roughly 1.0× SILICOM LTD.). SILICOM LTD. runs the higher net margin — -18.5% vs -198.9%, a 180.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, SILICOM LTD. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (6.6% vs 1.7%). Elme Communities produced more free cash flow last quarter ($7.2M vs $-3.3M).
Elme Communities is a publicly traded U.S. real estate investment trust that primarily owns, operates and develops high-quality multifamily residential communities. It focuses on key growth markets across the U.S. Mid-Atlantic and Southeast, offering affordable to mid-tier housing options for diverse renter groups.
Silicom Ltd. is a publicly traded company, headquartered in Israel, that specializes in the design, manufacture and marketing of connectivity solutions for a range of servers and server-based systems. Its shares are listed on the NASDAQ Global Market and on the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange. Silicom is a member of the RAD Group family of companies.
ELME vs SILC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $62.1M | $61.9M |
| Net Profit | $-123.5M | $-11.5M |
| Gross Margin | 61.1% | 30.6% |
| Operating Margin | -183.3% | -19.8% |
| Net Margin | -198.9% | -18.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 1.7% | 6.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | -4058.7% | 16.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-1.40 | $-2.01 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $61.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $62.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $62.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $61.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $61.3M | $58.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $61.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $60.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $59.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $-11.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-123.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-3.0M | $-13.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-3.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-3.5M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-3.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 30.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 61.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 63.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 64.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 62.9% | 28.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 63.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 63.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 63.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | -19.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -183.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.4% | -22.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 7.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | -18.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -198.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -5.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -7.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -4.9% | -23.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -4.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -5.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -6.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $-2.01 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.40 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.04 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.05 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.04 | $-2.28 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.03 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.04 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.04 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $7.1M | $42.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $908.9M | $117.5M |
| Total Assets | $1.7B | $152.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $42.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.1M | $72.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $117.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $908.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.0B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $127.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.1B | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $152.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.8B | $150.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.9B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.9B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.9B | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $15.9M | $-2.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $7.2M | $-3.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 11.6% | -5.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 14.0% | 1.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $86.7M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $-2.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $29.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $16.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $95.2M | $18.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $20.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $28.9M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $21.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $-3.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $21.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $47.9M | $17.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $21.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | -5.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 34.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 17.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 78.1% | 29.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 34.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 12.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 77.4% | 1.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.1% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 22.9% | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ELME
| Residential Segment | $57.7M | 93% |
| Other | $4.4M | 7% |
SILC
Segment breakdown not available.
