vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Elme Communities (ELME) and SolarMax Technology, Inc. (SMXT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Elme Communities is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($62.1M vs $46.6M, roughly 1.3× SolarMax Technology, Inc.). SolarMax Technology, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -1.9% vs -198.9%, a 197.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, SolarMax Technology, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (623.5% vs 1.7%).
Elme Communities is a publicly traded U.S. real estate investment trust that primarily owns, operates and develops high-quality multifamily residential communities. It focuses on key growth markets across the U.S. Mid-Atlantic and Southeast, offering affordable to mid-tier housing options for diverse renter groups.
SolarMax Technology, Inc. develops, manufactures and sells high-efficiency solar PV modules and clean energy systems. It serves residential, commercial and industrial clients in North America and key Asia-Pacific markets, offering installation and after-sales support to boost low-carbon energy use.
ELME vs SMXT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $62.1M | $46.6M |
| Net Profit | $-123.5M | $-872.2K |
| Gross Margin | 61.1% | 2.7% |
| Operating Margin | -183.3% | -2.7% |
| Net Margin | -198.9% | -1.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 1.7% | 623.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -4058.7% | 77.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-1.40 | $-0.02 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $46.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $62.1M | $30.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $62.1M | $6.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $61.5M | $6.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $61.3M | $6.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $61.1M | $6.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $60.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $59.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $-872.2K | ||
| Q3 25 | $-123.5M | $-2.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.6M | $-1.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.7M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-3.0M | $-3.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-3.0M | $-9.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-3.5M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-3.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 2.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 61.1% | 3.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 63.5% | 8.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 64.2% | 20.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 62.9% | 14.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 63.5% | 19.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 63.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 63.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | -2.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -183.3% | -6.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.6% | -25.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.8% | -16.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.4% | -27.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.0% | -158.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 7.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | -1.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -198.9% | -7.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -5.7% | -27.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -7.6% | -18.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -4.9% | -60.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -4.9% | -152.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -5.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -6.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.02 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.40 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.04 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.05 | $-0.03 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.04 | $-0.07 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.03 | $-0.21 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.04 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.04 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $7.1M | $8.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $908.9M | $-12.2M |
| Total Assets | $1.7B | $91.3M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $8.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.1M | $5.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.8M | $1.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.4M | $6.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.1M | $7.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.8M | $8.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $-12.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $908.9M | $-11.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.0B | $-15.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $-15.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $-15.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $-10.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.1B | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $91.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $58.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8B | $38.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.8B | $38.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.8B | $38.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.9B | $43.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.9B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.9B | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $15.9M | $-2.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $7.2M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 11.6% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 14.0% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $86.7M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $-2.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.9M | $3.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $29.8M | $220.7K | ||
| Q1 25 | $16.2M | $-601.1K | ||
| Q4 24 | $95.2M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $20.7M | $203.6K | ||
| Q2 24 | $28.9M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $21.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $21.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $47.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $21.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 34.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 17.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 78.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 34.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 12.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 77.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.4% | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.1% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 22.9% | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ELME
| Residential Segment | $57.7M | 93% |
| Other | $4.4M | 7% |
SMXT
| Yabucoa | $35.9M | 77% |
| Other | $10.7M | 23% |
