vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Electrovaya Inc. (ELVA) and Gossamer Bio, Inc. (GOSS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Electrovaya Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($17.1M vs $13.8M, roughly 1.2× Gossamer Bio, Inc.). Electrovaya Inc. runs the higher net margin — 5.3% vs -342.3%, a 347.6% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Electrovaya Inc. is a developer and manufacturer of Lithium-ion batteries and battery systems for the automotive, warehousing, autonomous guided vehicles, and energy storage applications. The company has operations in NY State and based in Ontario, Canada.
Gossamer Bio, Inc. is a clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company focused on discovering, developing and commercializing novel therapeutics for patients with serious immunology, inflammation and oncology conditions. It advances a pipeline of proprietary product candidates across multiple clinical phases, primarily serving healthcare markets in North America and other global regions.
ELVA vs GOSS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $17.1M | $13.8M |
| Net Profit | $907.0K | $-47.2M |
| Gross Margin | 30.8% | — |
| Operating Margin | — | -333.6% |
| Net Margin | 5.3% | -342.3% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 47.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -43.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.02 | $-0.21 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $13.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $13.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $17.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $95.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0 | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $0 | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $0 |
| Q4 25 | — | $-47.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-48.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $907.0K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $49.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-41.9M | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $-40.0M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $-42.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 30.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | -333.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -369.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 54.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | -342.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -362.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 51.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.21 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-0.21 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.02 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.22 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.19 | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $-0.21 | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $-0.45 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.3M | $136.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $22.3M | $-122.8M |
| Total Assets | $53.9M | $172.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $136.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $180.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $354.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $244.4M | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $328.9M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $162.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-122.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-82.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $22.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $81.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $26.7M | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $104.6M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $-62.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | $172.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $208.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $53.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $373.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $259.4M | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $347.9M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $181.7M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-7.3M | $-48.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-9.7M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -56.8% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 14.1% | 0.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -8.06× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $-48.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-36.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $116.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-52.3M | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $-34.5M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $-38.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-9.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -56.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -8.06× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.36× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
