vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Electrovaya Inc. (ELVA) and NaaS Technology Inc. (NAAS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
NaaS Technology Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($25.9M vs $17.1M, roughly 1.5× Electrovaya Inc.). Electrovaya Inc. runs the higher net margin — 5.3% vs -193.3%, a 198.5% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Electrovaya Inc. is a developer and manufacturer of Lithium-ion batteries and battery systems for the automotive, warehousing, autonomous guided vehicles, and energy storage applications. The company has operations in NY State and based in Ontario, Canada.
NaaS Technology Inc. is a leading electric vehicle energy service provider based in China. It delivers one-stop solutions covering charging network operation, software and hardware support for charging station operators, and value-added services such as charging location search and payment for EV owners, serving both enterprise and individual customers across domestic and select overseas markets.
ELVA vs NAAS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2024
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $17.1M | $25.9M |
| Net Profit | $907.0K | $-50.0M |
| Gross Margin | 30.8% | 29.2% |
| Operating Margin | — | -144.2% |
| Net Margin | 5.3% | -193.3% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 121.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 18.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.02 | $-0.02 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.3M | $24.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $22.3M | $-33.4M |
| Total Assets | $53.9M | $180.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q2 25 | $1.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $24.7M |
| Q2 25 | $22.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-33.4M |
| Q2 25 | $53.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $180.2M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-7.3M | $-25.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-9.7M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -56.8% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 14.1% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -8.06× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q2 25 | $-7.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-25.7M |
| Q2 25 | $-9.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q2 25 | -56.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q2 25 | 14.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q2 25 | -8.06× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
