vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Electrovaya Inc. (ELVA) and Sunrun Inc. (RUN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Sunrun Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.2B vs $17.1M, roughly 67.6× Electrovaya Inc.). Sunrun Inc. runs the higher net margin — 8.9% vs 5.3%, a 3.6% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Electrovaya Inc. is a developer and manufacturer of Lithium-ion batteries and battery systems for the automotive, warehousing, autonomous guided vehicles, and energy storage applications. The company has operations in NY State and based in Ontario, Canada.
Sunrun Inc. is an American provider of photovoltaic systems and battery energy storage products, primarily for residential customers. The company was established in 2007 and is headquartered in San Francisco, California.
ELVA vs RUN — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 2025 vs Q4 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $17.1M | $1.2B |
| Net Profit | $907.0K | $103.6M |
| Gross Margin | 30.8% | — |
| Operating Margin | — | 8.4% |
| Net Margin | 5.3% | 8.9% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 123.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 103.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.02 | $0.38 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $724.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $17.1M | $569.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $504.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $518.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $537.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $523.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $458.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | $103.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $16.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $907.0K | $279.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $50.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-2.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-83.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $139.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-87.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 30.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 8.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -19.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -22.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -628.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -23.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -24.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -40.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | 8.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.3% | 49.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 9.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -542.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -15.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 26.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -19.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.38 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.06 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.02 | $1.07 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.20 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-12.59 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.37 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.55 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.40 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.3M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $14.7B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $22.3M | $3.1B |
| Total Assets | $53.9M | $22.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 4.69× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $14.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $14.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $14.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $13.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $12.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $12.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $12.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $11.1B |
| Q4 25 | — | $3.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $3.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $22.3M | $2.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $5.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $5.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $5.2B |
| Q4 25 | — | $22.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $22.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $53.9M | $21.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $20.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $19.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $22.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $21.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $20.8B |
| Q4 25 | — | 4.69× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 4.90× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 4.80× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 5.19× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 5.05× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.36× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.23× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.15× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-7.3M | $96.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-9.7M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -56.8% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 14.1% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -8.06× | 0.94× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $96.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-121.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.3M | $-292.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-104.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-258.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-156.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-208.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-143.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-9.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-156.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -56.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -29.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.94× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -7.33× | ||
| Q2 25 | -8.06× | -1.05× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -2.08× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -1.50× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ELVA
Segment breakdown not available.
RUN
| Products | $692.3M | 60% |
| Customer Agreements | $435.2M | 38% |
| Manufactured Product Other | $56.7M | 5% |
| Incentives | $31.3M | 3% |
