vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Eastman Chemical Company (EMN) and EPAM Systems (EPAM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Eastman Chemical Company is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.0B vs $1.4B, roughly 1.4× EPAM Systems). EPAM Systems runs the higher net margin — 7.8% vs 5.3%, a 2.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, EPAM Systems posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (12.8% vs -13.8%). Over the past eight quarters, EPAM Systems's revenue compounded faster (9.9% CAGR vs -8.6%).
Eastman Chemical Company is an American chemical products manufacturer based in Kingsport, Tennessee. Founded in 1920, it was formerly a subsidiary of Kodak until 1994. The company is an independent global specialty materials company that produces a broad range of advanced materials, chemicals and fibers for everyday purposes. It operates 36 manufacturing sites worldwide and employs approximately 14,000 people. In 2023, Eastman had sales revenue of approximately $9.21 billion.
EPAM Systems, Inc. is an American company that specializes in software engineering services, digital platform engineering, and digital product design, operating out of Newtown, Pennsylvania. EPAM is a founding member of the MACH Alliance.
EMN vs EPAM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.0B | $1.4B |
| Net Profit | $105.0M | $109.4M |
| Gross Margin | 17.1% | 30.1% |
| Operating Margin | — | 10.6% |
| Net Margin | 5.3% | 7.8% |
| Revenue YoY | -13.8% | 12.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | -42.3% | 5.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.93 | $1.97 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.0B | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.3B | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3B | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.2B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.5B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.4B | $1.1B |
| Q1 26 | $105.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $105.0M | $109.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $47.0M | $106.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $140.0M | $88.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $182.0M | $73.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $330.0M | $103.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $180.0M | $136.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $230.0M | $98.6M |
| Q1 26 | 17.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 17.1% | 30.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.7% | 29.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 22.1% | 28.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 24.8% | 26.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 24.7% | 30.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 24.6% | 34.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 25.3% | 29.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.6% | 10.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.1% | 10.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.4% | 9.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.0% | 7.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.2% | 10.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.4% | 15.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.1% | 10.5% |
| Q1 26 | 5.3% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.3% | 7.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.1% | 7.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.1% | 6.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.9% | 5.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.7% | 8.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.3% | 11.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.7% | 8.6% |
| Q1 26 | $0.93 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.93 | $1.97 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.40 | $1.91 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.20 | $1.56 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.57 | $1.28 | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.81 | $1.80 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.53 | $2.37 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.94 | $1.70 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $566.0M | $1.3B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $6.0B | $3.7B |
| Total Assets | $14.9B | $4.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $566.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $566.0M | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $837.0M | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.8B |
| Q1 26 | $6.0B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $6.0B | $3.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.8B | $3.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.8B | $3.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.9B | $3.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.8B | $3.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.7B | $3.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.6B | $3.4B |
| Q1 26 | $14.9B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $14.9B | $4.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.0B | $4.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.2B | $4.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.0B | $4.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.2B | $4.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $15.1B | $4.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.9B | $4.2B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $282.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $268.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 19.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 1.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 2.59× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $612.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $502.0M | $282.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $402.0M | $294.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $233.0M | $53.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-167.0M | $24.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $540.0M | $130.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $396.0M | $242.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $367.0M | $57.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $390.0M | $268.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $265.0M | $286.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $83.0M | $43.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-314.0M | $14.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $361.0M | $114.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $276.0M | $237.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $252.0M | $52.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 19.8% | 19.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.0% | 20.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.6% | 3.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -13.7% | 1.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.1% | 9.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.2% | 20.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.7% | 4.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.7% | 1.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.2% | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.6% | 0.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.4% | 0.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.0% | 1.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.9% | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.9% | 0.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.78× | 2.59× | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.55× | 2.76× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.66× | 0.60× | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.92× | 0.33× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.64× | 1.26× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.20× | 1.77× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.60× | 0.58× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
