vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Eastman Chemical Company (EMN) and Fortive (FTV). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Eastman Chemical Company is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.0B vs $1.1B, roughly 1.8× Fortive). Fortive runs the higher net margin — 12.8% vs 5.3%, a 7.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Fortive posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (7.7% vs -13.8%). Over the past eight quarters, Eastman Chemical Company's revenue compounded faster (-8.6% CAGR vs -17.0%).
Eastman Chemical Company is an American chemical products manufacturer based in Kingsport, Tennessee. Founded in 1920, it was formerly a subsidiary of Kodak until 1994. The company is an independent global specialty materials company that produces a broad range of advanced materials, chemicals and fibers for everyday purposes. It operates 36 manufacturing sites worldwide and employs approximately 14,000 people. In 2023, Eastman had sales revenue of approximately $9.21 billion.
Fortive Corporation is an American industrial technology conglomerate company headquartered in Everett, Washington. The company specializes in providing essential technologies for connected workflow solutions; designing, developing, manufacturing and distributing professional and engineered products, software and services. Their products and services are split into three strategic segments; Intelligent Operating Solutions, Precision Technologies, and Advanced Healthcare Solutions. As of Decem...
EMN vs FTV — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.0B | $1.1B |
| Net Profit | $105.0M | $136.4M |
| Gross Margin | 17.1% | 63.2% |
| Operating Margin | — | 17.9% |
| Net Margin | 5.3% | 12.8% |
| Revenue YoY | -13.8% | 7.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | -42.3% | 21.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.93 | $0.44 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $2.0B | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.0B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.3B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3B | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.2B | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.5B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.4B | $1.6B |
| Q1 26 | $105.0M | $136.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | $105.0M | $185.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $47.0M | $55.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $140.0M | $166.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $182.0M | $171.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $330.0M | $208.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $180.0M | $221.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $230.0M | $195.1M |
| Q1 26 | 17.1% | 63.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 17.1% | 63.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.7% | 63.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 22.1% | 59.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 24.8% | 59.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 24.7% | 60.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 24.6% | 60.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 25.3% | 59.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | 17.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.6% | 20.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.1% | 15.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.4% | 14.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.0% | 15.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.2% | 19.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.4% | 19.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.1% | 19.4% |
| Q1 26 | 5.3% | 12.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.3% | 16.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.1% | 5.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.1% | 11.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.9% | 11.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.7% | 12.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.3% | 14.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.7% | 12.6% |
| Q1 26 | $0.93 | $0.44 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.93 | $0.60 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.40 | $0.16 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.20 | $0.49 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.57 | $0.50 | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.81 | $0.60 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.53 | $0.63 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.94 | $0.55 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $566.0M | $356.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $3.5B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $6.0B | $6.1B |
| Total Assets | $14.9B | $11.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.57× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $566.0M | $356.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $566.0M | $375.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $430.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $892.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $837.0M | $813.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $811.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $644.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | $3.5B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $3.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $3.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $4.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $3.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $3.8B |
| Q1 26 | $6.0B | $6.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | $6.0B | $6.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.8B | $6.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.8B | $10.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.9B | $10.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.8B | $10.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.7B | $10.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.6B | $10.5B |
| Q1 26 | $14.9B | $11.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | $14.9B | $11.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.0B | $11.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.2B | $18.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.0B | $17.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.2B | $17.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $15.1B | $17.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.9B | $17.3B |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.57× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.50× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.51× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.46× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.38× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.36× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.37× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.36× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $234.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 2.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.72× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $234.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $502.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $402.0M | $164.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $233.0M | $311.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-167.0M | $241.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $540.0M | $502.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $396.0M | $459.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $367.0M | $308.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $390.0M | $313.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $265.0M | $153.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $83.0M | $274.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-314.0M | $215.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $361.0M | $465.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $276.0M | $431.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $252.0M | $279.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 19.8% | 28.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.0% | 14.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.6% | 18.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -13.7% | 14.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.1% | 28.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.2% | 28.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.7% | 18.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | 2.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.7% | 2.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.2% | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.6% | 2.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.4% | 1.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.0% | 2.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.9% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.9% | 1.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.72× | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.78× | 5.83× | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.55× | 2.99× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.66× | 1.87× | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.92× | 1.41× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.64× | 2.41× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.20× | 2.07× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.60× | 1.58× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
