vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Eastman Chemical Company (EMN) and GLOBAL PARTNERS LP (GLP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

GLOBAL PARTNERS LP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.2B vs $2.0B, roughly 1.1× Eastman Chemical Company). Eastman Chemical Company runs the higher net margin — 5.3% vs 1.1%, a 4.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, GLOBAL PARTNERS LP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (7.0% vs -13.8%). Over the past eight quarters, GLOBAL PARTNERS LP's revenue compounded faster (0.2% CAGR vs -8.6%).

Eastman Chemical Company is an American chemical products manufacturer based in Kingsport, Tennessee. Founded in 1920, it was formerly a subsidiary of Kodak until 1994. The company is an independent global specialty materials company that produces a broad range of advanced materials, chemicals and fibers for everyday purposes. It operates 36 manufacturing sites worldwide and employs approximately 14,000 people. In 2023, Eastman had sales revenue of approximately $9.21 billion.

Global Partners LP is an American energy supply company ranked 361 in the 2018 Fortune 500. The company is organized as a master limited partnership, and its operations focus on the importing of petroleum products and marketing them in North America. It wholesales products like crude oil, diesel oil, gasoline, heating oil and kerosene.

EMN vs GLP — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
GLP
GLP
1.1× larger
GLP
$2.2B
$2.0B
EMN
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
GLP
GLP
+20.8% gap
GLP
7.0%
-13.8%
EMN
Higher net margin
EMN
EMN
4.2% more per $
EMN
5.3%
1.1%
GLP
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
GLP
GLP
Annualised
GLP
0.2%
-8.6%
EMN

Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
EMN
EMN
GLP
GLP
Revenue
$2.0B
$2.2B
Net Profit
$105.0M
$25.1M
Gross Margin
17.1%
11.9%
Operating Margin
2.6%
Net Margin
5.3%
1.1%
Revenue YoY
-13.8%
7.0%
Net Profit YoY
-42.3%
5.0%
EPS (diluted)
$0.93

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
EMN
EMN
GLP
GLP
Q1 26
$2.0B
Q4 25
$2.0B
$2.2B
Q3 25
$2.2B
$2.2B
Q2 25
$2.3B
$2.1B
Q1 25
$2.3B
$2.2B
Q4 24
$2.2B
$2.1B
Q3 24
$2.5B
$2.1B
Q2 24
$2.4B
$2.3B
Net Profit
EMN
EMN
GLP
GLP
Q1 26
$105.0M
Q4 25
$105.0M
$25.1M
Q3 25
$47.0M
$29.0M
Q2 25
$140.0M
$25.2M
Q1 25
$182.0M
$18.7M
Q4 24
$330.0M
$23.9M
Q3 24
$180.0M
$45.9M
Q2 24
$230.0M
$46.1M
Gross Margin
EMN
EMN
GLP
GLP
Q1 26
17.1%
Q4 25
17.1%
11.9%
Q3 25
19.7%
12.1%
Q2 25
22.1%
13.1%
Q1 25
24.8%
11.7%
Q4 24
24.7%
13.0%
Q3 24
24.6%
13.4%
Q2 24
25.3%
12.6%
Operating Margin
EMN
EMN
GLP
GLP
Q1 26
Q4 25
0.6%
2.6%
Q3 25
6.1%
2.7%
Q2 25
7.4%
2.9%
Q1 25
11.0%
2.6%
Q4 24
13.2%
2.8%
Q3 24
11.4%
3.9%
Q2 24
12.1%
3.7%
Net Margin
EMN
EMN
GLP
GLP
Q1 26
5.3%
Q4 25
5.3%
1.1%
Q3 25
2.1%
1.3%
Q2 25
6.1%
1.2%
Q1 25
7.9%
0.9%
Q4 24
14.7%
1.2%
Q3 24
7.3%
2.1%
Q2 24
9.7%
2.0%
EPS (diluted)
EMN
EMN
GLP
GLP
Q1 26
$0.93
Q4 25
$0.93
Q3 25
$0.40
Q2 25
$1.20
Q1 25
$1.57
Q4 24
$2.81
Q3 24
$1.53
Q2 24
$1.94

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
EMN
EMN
GLP
GLP
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$566.0M
Total DebtLower is stronger
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$6.0B
Total Assets
$14.9B
$3.9B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
EMN
EMN
GLP
GLP
Q1 26
$566.0M
Q4 25
$566.0M
Q3 25
Q2 25
Q1 25
Q4 24
$837.0M
Q3 24
Q2 24
Stockholders' Equity
EMN
EMN
GLP
GLP
Q1 26
$6.0B
Q4 25
$6.0B
Q3 25
$5.8B
Q2 25
$5.8B
Q1 25
$5.9B
Q4 24
$5.8B
Q3 24
$5.7B
Q2 24
$5.6B
Total Assets
EMN
EMN
GLP
GLP
Q1 26
$14.9B
Q4 25
$14.9B
$3.9B
Q3 25
$15.0B
$3.7B
Q2 25
$15.2B
$3.8B
Q1 25
$15.0B
$3.8B
Q4 24
$15.2B
$3.8B
Q3 24
$15.1B
$3.7B
Q2 24
$14.9B
$3.8B

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
EMN
EMN
GLP
GLP
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$101.0M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$62.2M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
2.8%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
1.8%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
4.03×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$193.3M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
EMN
EMN
GLP
GLP
Q1 26
Q4 25
$502.0M
$101.0M
Q3 25
$402.0M
$19.0M
Q2 25
$233.0M
$216.3M
Q1 25
$-167.0M
$-51.6M
Q4 24
$540.0M
$67.2M
Q3 24
$396.0M
$122.7M
Q2 24
$367.0M
$24.3M
Free Cash Flow
EMN
EMN
GLP
GLP
Q1 26
Q4 25
$390.0M
$62.2M
Q3 25
$265.0M
$-678.0K
Q2 25
$83.0M
$201.3M
Q1 25
$-314.0M
$-69.5M
Q4 24
$361.0M
$20.4M
Q3 24
$276.0M
$98.4M
Q2 24
$252.0M
$8.7M
FCF Margin
EMN
EMN
GLP
GLP
Q1 26
Q4 25
19.8%
2.8%
Q3 25
12.0%
-0.0%
Q2 25
3.6%
9.7%
Q1 25
-13.7%
-3.2%
Q4 24
16.1%
1.0%
Q3 24
11.2%
4.6%
Q2 24
10.7%
0.4%
Capex Intensity
EMN
EMN
GLP
GLP
Q1 26
Q4 25
5.7%
1.8%
Q3 25
6.2%
0.9%
Q2 25
6.6%
0.7%
Q1 25
6.4%
0.8%
Q4 24
8.0%
2.3%
Q3 24
4.9%
1.1%
Q2 24
4.9%
0.7%
Cash Conversion
EMN
EMN
GLP
GLP
Q1 26
Q4 25
4.78×
4.03×
Q3 25
8.55×
0.66×
Q2 25
1.66×
8.58×
Q1 25
-0.92×
-2.76×
Q4 24
1.64×
2.82×
Q3 24
2.20×
2.67×
Q2 24
1.60×
0.53×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

EMN
EMN

Segment breakdown not available.

GLP
GLP

Gasoline$1.0B46%
Refined Petroleum Products Renewable Fuels Crude Oil And Propane$884.7M40%
Commercial Segment$187.6M8%
Station Operations$110.5M5%

Related Comparisons