vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Eastman Chemical Company (EMN) and Kellanova (K). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Kellanova is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($3.3B vs $2.0B, roughly 1.7× Eastman Chemical Company). Kellanova runs the higher net margin — 9.5% vs 5.3%, a 4.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Kellanova posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (0.8% vs -13.8%). Over the past eight quarters, Eastman Chemical Company's revenue compounded faster (-8.6% CAGR vs -9.0%).

Eastman Chemical Company is an American chemical products manufacturer based in Kingsport, Tennessee. Founded in 1920, it was formerly a subsidiary of Kodak until 1994. The company is an independent global specialty materials company that produces a broad range of advanced materials, chemicals and fibers for everyday purposes. It operates 36 manufacturing sites worldwide and employs approximately 14,000 people. In 2023, Eastman had sales revenue of approximately $9.21 billion.

Kellanova, formerly known as the Kellogg Company, is an American multinational food manufacturing company owned by Mars Inc. headquartered in Chicago, Illinois. The renaming took effect on October 2, 2023, and the company's North American cereal operations were spun off to form the WK Kellogg Co at the same time.

EMN vs K — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
K
K
1.7× larger
K
$3.3B
$2.0B
EMN
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
K
K
+14.7% gap
K
0.8%
-13.8%
EMN
Higher net margin
K
K
4.2% more per $
K
9.5%
5.3%
EMN
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
EMN
EMN
Annualised
EMN
-8.6%
-9.0%
K

Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2025

Metric
EMN
EMN
K
K
Revenue
$2.0B
$3.3B
Net Profit
$105.0M
$309.0M
Gross Margin
17.1%
33.3%
Operating Margin
13.9%
Net Margin
5.3%
9.5%
Revenue YoY
-13.8%
0.8%
Net Profit YoY
-42.3%
-15.8%
EPS (diluted)
$0.93
$0.88

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
EMN
EMN
K
K
Q1 26
$2.0B
Q4 25
$2.0B
Q3 25
$2.2B
$3.3B
Q2 25
$2.3B
$3.2B
Q1 25
$2.3B
$3.1B
Q4 24
$2.2B
$3.1B
Q3 24
$2.5B
$3.2B
Q2 24
$2.4B
$3.2B
Net Profit
EMN
EMN
K
K
Q1 26
$105.0M
Q4 25
$105.0M
Q3 25
$47.0M
$309.0M
Q2 25
$140.0M
$299.0M
Q1 25
$182.0M
$304.0M
Q4 24
$330.0M
$365.0M
Q3 24
$180.0M
$367.0M
Q2 24
$230.0M
$344.0M
Gross Margin
EMN
EMN
K
K
Q1 26
17.1%
Q4 25
17.1%
Q3 25
19.7%
33.3%
Q2 25
22.1%
34.0%
Q1 25
24.8%
34.3%
Q4 24
24.7%
37.7%
Q3 24
24.6%
36.4%
Q2 24
25.3%
36.4%
Operating Margin
EMN
EMN
K
K
Q1 26
Q4 25
0.6%
Q3 25
6.1%
13.9%
Q2 25
7.4%
13.7%
Q1 25
11.0%
13.9%
Q4 24
13.2%
17.0%
Q3 24
11.4%
14.1%
Q2 24
12.1%
15.4%
Net Margin
EMN
EMN
K
K
Q1 26
5.3%
Q4 25
5.3%
Q3 25
2.1%
9.5%
Q2 25
6.1%
9.3%
Q1 25
7.9%
9.9%
Q4 24
14.7%
11.7%
Q3 24
7.3%
11.4%
Q2 24
9.7%
10.8%
EPS (diluted)
EMN
EMN
K
K
Q1 26
$0.93
Q4 25
$0.93
Q3 25
$0.40
$0.88
Q2 25
$1.20
$0.85
Q1 25
$1.57
$0.87
Q4 24
$2.81
$1.05
Q3 24
$1.53
$1.05
Q2 24
$1.94
$1.00

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
EMN
EMN
K
K
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$566.0M
$240.0M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$4.3B
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$6.0B
$4.2B
Total Assets
$14.9B
$15.6B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
1.02×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
EMN
EMN
K
K
Q1 26
$566.0M
Q4 25
$566.0M
Q3 25
$240.0M
Q2 25
$354.0M
Q1 25
$330.0M
Q4 24
$837.0M
$694.0M
Q3 24
$569.0M
Q2 24
$272.0M
Total Debt
EMN
EMN
K
K
Q1 26
Q4 25
Q3 25
$4.3B
Q2 25
$4.3B
Q1 25
$5.0B
Q4 24
$5.0B
Q3 24
$5.1B
Q2 24
$5.0B
Stockholders' Equity
EMN
EMN
K
K
Q1 26
$6.0B
Q4 25
$6.0B
Q3 25
$5.8B
$4.2B
Q2 25
$5.8B
$4.1B
Q1 25
$5.9B
$3.9B
Q4 24
$5.8B
$3.8B
Q3 24
$5.7B
$3.6B
Q2 24
$5.6B
$3.3B
Total Assets
EMN
EMN
K
K
Q1 26
$14.9B
Q4 25
$14.9B
Q3 25
$15.0B
$15.6B
Q2 25
$15.2B
$15.9B
Q1 25
$15.0B
$15.5B
Q4 24
$15.2B
$15.6B
Q3 24
$15.1B
$15.8B
Q2 24
$14.9B
$15.3B
Debt / Equity
EMN
EMN
K
K
Q1 26
Q4 25
Q3 25
1.02×
Q2 25
1.05×
Q1 25
1.28×
Q4 24
1.32×
Q3 24
1.40×
Q2 24
1.51×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
EMN
EMN
K
K
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$503.0M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$359.0M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
11.0%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
4.4%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
1.63×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$599.0M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
EMN
EMN
K
K
Q1 26
Q4 25
$502.0M
Q3 25
$402.0M
$503.0M
Q2 25
$233.0M
$169.0M
Q1 25
$-167.0M
$116.0M
Q4 24
$540.0M
$467.0M
Q3 24
$396.0M
$553.0M
Q2 24
$367.0M
$376.0M
Free Cash Flow
EMN
EMN
K
K
Q1 26
Q4 25
$390.0M
Q3 25
$265.0M
$359.0M
Q2 25
$83.0M
$21.0M
Q1 25
$-314.0M
$-60.0M
Q4 24
$361.0M
$279.0M
Q3 24
$276.0M
$410.0M
Q2 24
$252.0M
$234.0M
FCF Margin
EMN
EMN
K
K
Q1 26
Q4 25
19.8%
Q3 25
12.0%
11.0%
Q2 25
3.6%
0.7%
Q1 25
-13.7%
-1.9%
Q4 24
16.1%
8.9%
Q3 24
11.2%
12.7%
Q2 24
10.7%
7.3%
Capex Intensity
EMN
EMN
K
K
Q1 26
Q4 25
5.7%
Q3 25
6.2%
4.4%
Q2 25
6.6%
4.6%
Q1 25
6.4%
5.7%
Q4 24
8.0%
6.0%
Q3 24
4.9%
4.4%
Q2 24
4.9%
4.4%
Cash Conversion
EMN
EMN
K
K
Q1 26
Q4 25
4.78×
Q3 25
8.55×
1.63×
Q2 25
1.66×
0.57×
Q1 25
-0.92×
0.38×
Q4 24
1.64×
1.28×
Q3 24
2.20×
1.51×
Q2 24
1.60×
1.09×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

EMN
EMN

Segment breakdown not available.

K
K

Retail Channel Snacks$2.0B62%
Retail Channel Cereal$678.0M21%
Noodlesand Other$280.0M9%
Frozen And Specialty Channels$275.0M8%

Related Comparisons