vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Eastman Chemical Company (EMN) and Liberty Energy Inc. (LBRT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Eastman Chemical Company is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.0B vs $1.0B, roughly 1.9× Liberty Energy Inc.). Eastman Chemical Company runs the higher net margin — 5.3% vs 2.2%, a 3.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Liberty Energy Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (4.5% vs -13.8%). Over the past eight quarters, Liberty Energy Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (-6.2% CAGR vs -8.6%).
Eastman Chemical Company is an American chemical products manufacturer based in Kingsport, Tennessee. Founded in 1920, it was formerly a subsidiary of Kodak until 1994. The company is an independent global specialty materials company that produces a broad range of advanced materials, chemicals and fibers for everyday purposes. It operates 36 manufacturing sites worldwide and employs approximately 14,000 people. In 2023, Eastman had sales revenue of approximately $9.21 billion.
Liberty Energy Inc. is a North American energy services provider specializing in hydraulic fracturing and well completion solutions for oil and gas operators. It serves clients across major U.S. shale basins, offering low-emission equipment and tailored support to optimize well productivity.
EMN vs LBRT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.0B | $1.0B |
| Net Profit | $105.0M | $22.6M |
| Gross Margin | 17.1% | — |
| Operating Margin | — | 2.2% |
| Net Margin | 5.3% | 2.2% |
| Revenue YoY | -13.8% | 4.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -42.3% | 64.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.93 | $0.14 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $2.0B | $1.0B | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.0B | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | $947.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.3B | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3B | $977.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.2B | $943.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.5B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.4B | $1.2B |
| Q1 26 | $105.0M | $22.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $105.0M | $13.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $47.0M | $43.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $140.0M | $71.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $182.0M | $20.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $330.0M | $51.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $180.0M | $73.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $230.0M | $108.4M |
| Q1 26 | 17.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 17.1% | 20.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.7% | 18.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 22.1% | 22.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 24.8% | 22.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 24.7% | 21.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 24.6% | 26.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 25.3% | 27.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | 2.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.6% | 1.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.1% | -0.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.4% | 3.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.0% | 1.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.2% | 2.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.4% | 9.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.1% | 12.2% |
| Q1 26 | 5.3% | 2.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.3% | 1.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.1% | 4.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.1% | 6.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.9% | 2.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.7% | 5.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.3% | 6.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.7% | 9.3% |
| Q1 26 | $0.93 | $0.14 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.93 | $0.08 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.40 | $0.26 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.20 | $0.43 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.57 | $0.12 | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.81 | $0.31 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.53 | $0.44 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.94 | $0.64 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $566.0M | $699.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $7.1M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $6.0B | $1.9B |
| Total Assets | $14.9B | $4.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.00× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $566.0M | $699.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $566.0M | $27.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $13.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $19.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $24.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $837.0M | $20.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $23.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $30.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $7.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $246.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $190.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | $6.0B | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 25 | $6.0B | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.8B | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.8B | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.9B | $2.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.8B | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.7B | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.6B | $1.9B |
| Q1 26 | $14.9B | $4.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $14.9B | $3.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.0B | $3.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.2B | $3.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.0B | $3.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.2B | $3.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $15.1B | $3.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.9B | $3.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.00× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.12× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.10× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
