vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Eastman Chemical Company (EMN) and LOGITECH INTERNATIONAL S.A. (LOGI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Eastman Chemical Company is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.0B vs $1.4B, roughly 1.4× LOGITECH INTERNATIONAL S.A.). LOGITECH INTERNATIONAL S.A. runs the higher net margin — 17.7% vs 5.3%, a 12.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, LOGITECH INTERNATIONAL S.A. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (6.1% vs -13.8%). Over the past eight quarters, LOGITECH INTERNATIONAL S.A.'s revenue compounded faster (18.5% CAGR vs -8.6%).
Eastman Chemical Company is an American chemical products manufacturer based in Kingsport, Tennessee. Founded in 1920, it was formerly a subsidiary of Kodak until 1994. The company is an independent global specialty materials company that produces a broad range of advanced materials, chemicals and fibers for everyday purposes. It operates 36 manufacturing sites worldwide and employs approximately 14,000 people. In 2023, Eastman had sales revenue of approximately $9.21 billion.
Logitech International S.A. is a Swiss multinational manufacturer of computer peripherals and software. Headquartered in Lausanne, Switzerland, the company has offices throughout Europe, Asia, Oceania, and the Americas. It is a component of the Swiss Market Index, and is listed on the Nasdaq.
EMN vs LOGI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.0B | $1.4B |
| Net Profit | $105.0M | $251.0M |
| Gross Margin | 17.1% | 43.2% |
| Operating Margin | — | 20.1% |
| Net Margin | 5.3% | 17.7% |
| Revenue YoY | -13.8% | 6.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | -42.3% | 25.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.93 | $1.69 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.0B | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.3B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3B | $1.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.2B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.5B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.4B | $1.1B |
| Q1 26 | $105.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $105.0M | $251.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $47.0M | $170.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $140.0M | $146.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $182.0M | $144.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $330.0M | $200.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $180.0M | $145.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $230.0M | $141.8M |
| Q1 26 | 17.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 17.1% | 43.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.7% | 43.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 22.1% | 41.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 24.8% | 43.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 24.7% | 42.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 24.6% | 43.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 25.3% | 42.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.6% | 20.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.1% | 16.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.4% | 14.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.0% | 10.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.2% | 17.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.4% | 14.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.1% | 14.1% |
| Q1 26 | 5.3% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.3% | 17.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.1% | 14.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.1% | 12.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.9% | 14.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.7% | 14.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.3% | 13.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.7% | 13.0% |
| Q1 26 | $0.93 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.93 | $1.69 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.40 | $1.15 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.20 | $0.98 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.57 | $0.94 | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.81 | $1.32 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.53 | $0.95 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.94 | $0.92 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $566.0M | $1.8B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $6.0B | $2.3B |
| Total Assets | $14.9B | $4.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $566.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $566.0M | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $837.0M | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.5B |
| Q1 26 | $6.0B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $6.0B | $2.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.8B | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.8B | $2.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.9B | $2.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.8B | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.7B | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.6B | $2.2B |
| Q1 26 | $14.9B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $14.9B | $4.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.0B | $3.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.2B | $3.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.0B | $3.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.2B | $3.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $15.1B | $3.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.9B | $3.7B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $480.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $465.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 32.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 1.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.91× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $903.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $502.0M | $480.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $402.0M | $228.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $233.0M | $125.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-167.0M | $129.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $540.0M | $370.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $396.0M | $166.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $367.0M | $176.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $390.0M | $465.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $265.0M | $212.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $83.0M | $108.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-314.0M | $116.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $361.0M | $356.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $276.0M | $151.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $252.0M | $161.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 19.8% | 32.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.0% | 17.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.6% | 9.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -13.7% | 11.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.1% | 26.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.2% | 13.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.7% | 14.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.7% | 1.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.2% | 1.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.6% | 1.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.4% | 1.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.0% | 1.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.9% | 1.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.9% | 1.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.78× | 1.91× | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.55× | 1.34× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.66× | 0.86× | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.92× | 0.90× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.64× | 1.85× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.20× | 1.14× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.60× | 1.24× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
EMN
Segment breakdown not available.
LOGI
| Retail Gaming | $482.7M | 34% |
| Retail Keyboards Desktops | $254.6M | 18% |
| Retail Pointing Devices | $241.2M | 17% |
| Retail Video Collaboration | $193.3M | 14% |
| Retail Tablet And Other Accessories | $93.6M | 7% |
| Retail Webcams | $82.3M | 6% |
| Retail Headsets | $45.9M | 3% |
| Other Retail Products | $28.0M | 2% |
