vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Eastman Chemical Company (EMN) and LANDSTAR SYSTEM INC (LSTR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Eastman Chemical Company is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.0B vs $1.2B, roughly 1.7× LANDSTAR SYSTEM INC). Eastman Chemical Company runs the higher net margin — 5.3% vs 3.4%, a 2.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, LANDSTAR SYSTEM INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (1.6% vs -13.8%). Over the past eight quarters, LANDSTAR SYSTEM INC's revenue compounded faster (-2.2% CAGR vs -8.6%).
Eastman Chemical Company is an American chemical products manufacturer based in Kingsport, Tennessee. Founded in 1920, it was formerly a subsidiary of Kodak until 1994. The company is an independent global specialty materials company that produces a broad range of advanced materials, chemicals and fibers for everyday purposes. It operates 36 manufacturing sites worldwide and employs approximately 14,000 people. In 2023, Eastman had sales revenue of approximately $9.21 billion.
Landstar System, Inc. is an American transportation services company specializing in logistics and, more specifically, third-party logistics. Landstar utilizes an extensive network of over 8,800 independent owner-operators, referred to internally as business capacity owners (BCOs), over 1,000 independent freight agents, and over 70,000 vetted carriers. Landstar provides services principally throughout the United States and to a lesser extent in Canada and between the U.S. and Canada, Mexico, ...
EMN vs LSTR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.0B | $1.2B |
| Net Profit | $105.0M | $39.4M |
| Gross Margin | 17.1% | 9.6% |
| Operating Margin | — | 4.5% |
| Net Margin | 5.3% | 3.4% |
| Revenue YoY | -13.8% | 1.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | -42.3% | 32.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.93 | $1.16 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $2.0B | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.0B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.3B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3B | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.2B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.5B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.4B | $1.2B |
| Q1 26 | $105.0M | $39.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | $105.0M | $23.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $47.0M | $19.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $140.0M | $41.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $182.0M | $29.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $330.0M | $46.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $180.0M | $50.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $230.0M | $52.6M |
| Q1 26 | 17.1% | 9.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | 17.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 22.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 24.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 24.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 24.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 25.3% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 4.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.6% | 2.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.1% | 2.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.4% | 4.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.0% | 3.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.2% | 4.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.4% | 5.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.1% | 5.6% |
| Q1 26 | 5.3% | 3.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.3% | 2.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.1% | 1.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.1% | 3.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.9% | 2.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.7% | 3.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.3% | 4.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.7% | 4.3% |
| Q1 26 | $0.93 | $1.16 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.93 | $0.70 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.40 | $0.56 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.20 | $1.20 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.57 | $0.85 | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.81 | $1.30 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.53 | $1.41 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.94 | $1.48 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $566.0M | $411.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $26.1M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $6.0B | $799.0M |
| Total Assets | $14.9B | $1.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.03× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $566.0M | $411.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $566.0M | $452.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $434.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $426.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $473.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $837.0M | $566.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $531.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $504.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $26.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $0 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0 |
| Q1 26 | $6.0B | $799.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $6.0B | $795.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.8B | $888.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.8B | $921.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.9B | $930.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.8B | $972.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.7B | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.6B | $1.0B |
| Q1 26 | $14.9B | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | $14.9B | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.0B | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.2B | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.0B | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.2B | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $15.1B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.9B | $1.8B |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.03× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.00× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.00× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.00× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.00× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.00× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.00× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.00× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
