vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Eastman Chemical Company (EMN) and M/I HOMES, INC. (MHO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Eastman Chemical Company is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.0B vs $1.1B, roughly 1.7× M/I HOMES, INC.). M/I HOMES, INC. runs the higher net margin — 5.6% vs 5.3%, a 0.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, M/I HOMES, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-4.8% vs -13.8%). Over the past eight quarters, M/I HOMES, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (4.7% CAGR vs -8.6%).
Eastman Chemical Company is an American chemical products manufacturer based in Kingsport, Tennessee. Founded in 1920, it was formerly a subsidiary of Kodak until 1994. The company is an independent global specialty materials company that produces a broad range of advanced materials, chemicals and fibers for everyday purposes. It operates 36 manufacturing sites worldwide and employs approximately 14,000 people. In 2023, Eastman had sales revenue of approximately $9.21 billion.
M/I Homes, Inc. is a leading U.S. residential construction company that designs, builds and sells single-family homes, townhomes and duplexes across multiple U.S. states. It caters to entry-level, move-up and luxury homebuyers, offering energy-efficient designs, flexible floor plans and personalized customization options.
EMN vs MHO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.0B | $1.1B |
| Net Profit | $105.0M | $64.0M |
| Gross Margin | 17.1% | 17.4% |
| Operating Margin | — | 6.5% |
| Net Margin | 5.3% | 5.6% |
| Revenue YoY | -13.8% | -4.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | -42.3% | -52.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.93 | $2.42 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.0B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.3B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3B | $976.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.2B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.5B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.4B | $1.1B |
| Q1 26 | $105.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $105.0M | $64.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $47.0M | $106.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $140.0M | $121.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $182.0M | $111.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $330.0M | $133.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $180.0M | $145.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $230.0M | $146.7M |
| Q1 26 | 17.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 17.1% | 17.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.7% | 24.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 22.1% | 24.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 24.8% | 25.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 24.7% | 24.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 24.6% | 27.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 25.3% | 27.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.6% | 6.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.1% | 12.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.4% | 13.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.0% | 14.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.2% | 13.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.4% | 15.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.1% | 16.8% |
| Q1 26 | 5.3% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.3% | 5.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.1% | 9.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.1% | 10.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.9% | 11.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.7% | 11.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.3% | 12.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.7% | 13.2% |
| Q1 26 | $0.93 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.93 | $2.42 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.40 | $3.92 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.20 | $4.42 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.57 | $3.98 | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.81 | $4.71 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.53 | $5.10 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.94 | $5.12 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $566.0M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $6.0B | $3.2B |
| Total Assets | $14.9B | $4.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $566.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $566.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $837.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | $6.0B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $6.0B | $3.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.8B | $3.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.8B | $3.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.9B | $3.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.8B | $2.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.7B | $2.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.6B | $2.7B |
| Q1 26 | $14.9B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $14.9B | $4.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.0B | $4.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.2B | $4.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.0B | $4.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.2B | $4.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $15.1B | $4.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.9B | $4.3B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $-8.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-13.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -1.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | -0.14× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $127.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $502.0M | $-8.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $402.0M | $43.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $233.0M | $37.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-167.0M | $64.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $540.0M | $104.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $396.0M | $-67.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $367.0M | $27.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $390.0M | $-13.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $265.0M | $42.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $83.0M | $35.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-314.0M | $63.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $361.0M | $102.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $276.0M | $-68.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $252.0M | $22.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 19.8% | -1.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.0% | 3.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.6% | 3.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -13.7% | 6.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.1% | 8.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.2% | -6.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.7% | 2.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.7% | 0.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.2% | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.6% | 0.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.4% | 0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.0% | 0.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.9% | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.9% | 0.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.78× | -0.14× | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.55× | 0.41× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.66× | 0.31× | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.92× | 0.58× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.64× | 0.78× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.20× | -0.47× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.60× | 0.19× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
EMN
Segment breakdown not available.
MHO
| Southern Homebuilding | $615.6M | 54% |
| Northern Homebuilding | $503.9M | 44% |
| Financial Service | $27.8M | 2% |
| Land | $4.7M | 0% |
