vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Eastman Chemical Company (EMN) and Science Applications International Corp (SAIC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Eastman Chemical Company is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.0B vs $1.9B, roughly 1.1× Science Applications International Corp). Eastman Chemical Company runs the higher net margin — 5.3% vs 4.2%, a 1.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Science Applications International Corp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (2.6% vs -13.8%). Over the past eight quarters, Science Applications International Corp's revenue compounded faster (2.3% CAGR vs -8.6%).
Eastman Chemical Company is an American chemical products manufacturer based in Kingsport, Tennessee. Founded in 1920, it was formerly a subsidiary of Kodak until 1994. The company is an independent global specialty materials company that produces a broad range of advanced materials, chemicals and fibers for everyday purposes. It operates 36 manufacturing sites worldwide and employs approximately 14,000 people. In 2023, Eastman had sales revenue of approximately $9.21 billion.
Science Applications International Corporation, Inc. (SAIC) is an American technology company headquartered in Reston, Virginia that provides government services and information technology support.
EMN vs SAIC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.0B | $1.9B |
| Net Profit | $105.0M | $78.0M |
| Gross Margin | 17.1% | 12.2% |
| Operating Margin | — | 6.9% |
| Net Margin | 5.3% | 4.2% |
| Revenue YoY | -13.8% | 2.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | -42.3% | -3.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.93 | $1.69 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.0B | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.3B | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.2B | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.5B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.4B | $1.8B |
| Q1 26 | $105.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $105.0M | $78.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $47.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $140.0M | $68.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $182.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $330.0M | $106.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $180.0M | $81.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $230.0M | $77.0M |
| Q1 26 | 17.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 17.1% | 12.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 22.1% | 11.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 24.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 24.7% | 12.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 24.6% | 11.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 25.3% | 11.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.6% | 6.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.4% | 6.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.2% | 8.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.4% | 7.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.1% | 7.1% |
| Q1 26 | 5.3% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.3% | 4.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.1% | 3.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.7% | 5.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.3% | 4.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.7% | 4.2% |
| Q1 26 | $0.93 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.93 | $1.69 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.40 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.20 | $1.42 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.57 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.81 | $2.13 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.53 | $1.58 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.94 | $1.48 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $566.0M | $45.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $2.5B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $6.0B | $1.5B |
| Total Assets | $14.9B | $5.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 1.64× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $566.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $566.0M | $45.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $47.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $837.0M | $46.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $48.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $49.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.1B |
| Q1 26 | $6.0B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $6.0B | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.8B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.8B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.9B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.8B | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.7B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.6B | $1.8B |
| Q1 26 | $14.9B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $14.9B | $5.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.0B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.2B | $5.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.0B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.2B | $5.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $15.1B | $5.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.9B | $5.3B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.64× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.52× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.34× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.33× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.18× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $129.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $120.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 6.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.65× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $478.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $502.0M | $129.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $402.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $233.0M | $100.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-167.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $540.0M | $143.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $396.0M | $138.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $367.0M | $98.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $390.0M | $120.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $265.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $83.0M | $92.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-314.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $361.0M | $134.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $276.0M | $132.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $252.0M | $92.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 19.8% | 6.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.6% | 4.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -13.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.1% | 6.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.2% | 7.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.7% | 5.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.7% | 0.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.6% | 0.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.0% | 0.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.9% | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.9% | 0.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.78× | 1.65× | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.55× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.66× | 1.47× | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.92× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.64× | 1.35× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.20× | 1.70× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.60× | 1.27× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
EMN
Segment breakdown not available.
SAIC
| Prime Contractor | $1.3B | 71% |
| Civilian | $427.0M | 23% |
| Subcontractor | $116.0M | 6% |
| Commercial State And Local Agencies | $7.0M | 0% |
