vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Eastman Chemical Company (EMN) and Taylor Morrison Home Corp (TMHC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Eastman Chemical Company is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.0B vs $1.4B, roughly 1.4× Taylor Morrison Home Corp). Taylor Morrison Home Corp runs the higher net margin — 7.1% vs 5.3%, a 1.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Eastman Chemical Company posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-13.8% vs -26.8%). Over the past eight quarters, Eastman Chemical Company's revenue compounded faster (-8.6% CAGR vs -16.5%).
Eastman Chemical Company is an American chemical products manufacturer based in Kingsport, Tennessee. Founded in 1920, it was formerly a subsidiary of Kodak until 1994. The company is an independent global specialty materials company that produces a broad range of advanced materials, chemicals and fibers for everyday purposes. It operates 36 manufacturing sites worldwide and employs approximately 14,000 people. In 2023, Eastman had sales revenue of approximately $9.21 billion.
Taylor Morrison is one of the largest home building companies in the United States. Its corporate headquarters are in Scottsdale, Arizona. The company formed when Taylor Woodrow and Morrison Homes joined forces in July 2007. Taylor Morrison operates in Arizona, California, Colorado, Georgia, Florida, North Carolina, South Carolina, Nevada, Indiana, and Texas, building mid-to-upscale housing, as well as first-time and mid-market homes.
EMN vs TMHC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.0B | $1.4B |
| Net Profit | $105.0M | $98.6M |
| Gross Margin | 17.1% | 21.0% |
| Operating Margin | — | — |
| Net Margin | 5.3% | 7.1% |
| Revenue YoY | -13.8% | -26.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | -42.3% | -53.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.93 | $1.12 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $2.0B | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.0B | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.3B | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3B | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.2B | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.5B | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.4B | $2.0B |
| Q1 26 | $105.0M | $98.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $105.0M | $174.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $47.0M | $201.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $140.0M | $193.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $182.0M | $213.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $330.0M | $242.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $180.0M | $251.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $230.0M | $199.5M |
| Q1 26 | 17.1% | 21.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | 17.1% | 22.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.7% | 22.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 22.1% | 23.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 24.8% | 24.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 24.7% | 23.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 24.6% | 25.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 25.3% | 23.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.1% | — |
| Q1 26 | 5.3% | 7.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.3% | 8.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.1% | 9.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.1% | 9.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.9% | 11.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.7% | 10.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.3% | 11.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.7% | 10.0% |
| Q1 26 | $0.93 | $1.12 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.93 | $1.77 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.40 | $2.01 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.20 | $1.92 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.57 | $2.07 | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.81 | $2.29 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.53 | $2.37 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.94 | $1.86 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $566.0M | $652.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $6.0B | $6.2B |
| Total Assets | $14.9B | $9.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $566.0M | $652.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $566.0M | $850.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $370.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $130.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $377.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $837.0M | $487.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $256.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $246.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $2.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.2B |
| Q1 26 | $6.0B | $6.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | $6.0B | $6.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.8B | $6.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.8B | $6.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.9B | $6.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.8B | $5.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.7B | $5.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.6B | $5.5B |
| Q1 26 | $14.9B | $9.8B | ||
| Q4 25 | $14.9B | $9.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.0B | $9.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.2B | $9.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.0B | $9.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.2B | $9.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $15.1B | $9.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.9B | $9.1B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.36× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.35× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.35× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.35× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.36× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.37× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.39× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
EMN
Segment breakdown not available.
TMHC
| Home closings revenue, net | $1.3B | 95% |
| Financial services revenue, net | $49.3M | 4% |
| Land closings revenue | $14.5M | 1% |
| Amenity and other revenue | $11.9M | 1% |
