vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Empery Digital Inc. (EMPD) and Fly-E Group, Inc. (FLYE). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Empery Digital Inc. runs the higher net margin — 17291.1% vs -45.4%, a 17336.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Fly-E Group, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-42.7% vs -171.0%). Fly-E Group, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-2.5M vs $-3.0M). Over the past eight quarters, Fly-E Group, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (NaN% CAGR vs NaN%).
EMPD vs FLYE — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q2 2026
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $-662.3K | $3.9M |
| Net Profit | $-114.5M | $-1.8M |
| Gross Margin | — | 25.0% |
| Operating Margin | 17004.2% | -26.8% |
| Net Margin | 17291.1% | -45.4% |
| Revenue YoY | -171.0% | -42.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | -2095.0% | -55.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.16 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $-662.3K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $198.3K | $3.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $702.9K | $5.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $736.0K | $5.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $933.2K | $5.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1M | $6.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $940.9K | $7.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-114.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-29.2M | $-1.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.9M | $-2.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-2.5M | $-3.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-5.2M | $-684.5K | ||
| Q3 24 | $-13.6M | $-1.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-606.4K | $-179.5K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-26.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -47.1% | 25.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -21.1% | 42.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -6.2% | 37.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -217.0% | 45.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -856.9% | 42.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -230.9% | 39.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -56.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | 17004.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -17388.6% | -26.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -550.8% | -28.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -340.5% | -46.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -401.8% | -16.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -1127.9% | -18.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -587.7% | -0.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -410.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | 17291.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -14710.6% | -45.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -554.8% | -37.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -334.3% | -65.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -559.1% | -12.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -1267.7% | -16.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -64.5% | -2.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | -2520.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.16 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.80 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.57 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.91 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1727.83 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-191.46 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-96.59 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-2615.00 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $9.0M | $2.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $34.5K | $200.0K |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $269.2M | $15.3M |
| Total Assets | $372.4M | $31.6M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.00× | 0.01× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $9.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $18.8M | $2.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.8M | $2.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $840.1K | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.2M | $1.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $34.5K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $37.2K | $200.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $40.0K | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $42.7K | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $45.4K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $48.1K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $50.9K | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $53.6K | — |
| Q4 25 | $269.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $437.6M | $15.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $13.8M | $13.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $16.7M | $9.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $40.8K | $13.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.1M | $13.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.9M | $15.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | $372.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $492.3M | $31.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $17.9M | $33.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $21.7M | $33.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.2M | $37.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.0M | $38.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.8M | $35.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $17.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.00× | 0.01× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.11× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.01× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.01× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.01× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-3.0M | $-2.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-3.0M | $-2.5M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 452.0% | -64.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | -0.0% | 2.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-18.1M | $-8.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-3.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-7.6M | $-2.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.7M | $-5.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.6M | $-645.5K | ||
| Q4 24 | $-3.8M | $-1.8K | ||
| Q3 24 | $-4.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-3.7M | $-4.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-4.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-3.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-7.6M | $-2.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.7M | $-5.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.8M | $-661.4K | ||
| Q4 24 | $-3.8M | $-44.2K | ||
| Q3 24 | $-4.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-3.8M | $-4.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-4.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | 452.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -3844.9% | -64.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -521.0% | -101.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -512.7% | -13.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -407.3% | -0.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -380.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -401.9% | -61.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | -452.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | -0.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.0% | 2.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.4% | 2.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 27.4% | 0.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.8% | 0.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.2% | 4.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 12.7% | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.