vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Emerson Electric (EMR) and Tapestry, Inc. (TPR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Emerson Electric is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($4.3B vs $2.5B, roughly 1.7× Tapestry, Inc.). Tapestry, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 22.4% vs 13.9%, a 8.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Tapestry, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (14.0% vs 4.1%). Tapestry, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($1.0B vs $602.0M). Over the past eight quarters, Tapestry, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (29.9% CAGR vs -0.3%).
Emerson ElectricEMREarnings & Financial Report
Emerson Electric Co. is an American multinational corporation headquartered in St. Louis, Missouri. The Fortune 500 company delivers a range of engineering services, manufactures industrial automation equipment, climate control systems, and precision measurement instruments, and provides software engineering for industrial, commercial, and consumer markets.
Tapestry, Inc. is a leading American multinational luxury fashion holding company. It owns three iconic lifestyle brands: Coach, Kate Spade New York, and Stuart Weitzman, offering premium handbags, apparel, footwear, accessories, and fragrances to global consumers via physical retail stores and e-commerce platforms.
EMR vs TPR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q2 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $4.3B | $2.5B |
| Net Profit | $605.0M | $561.3M |
| Gross Margin | 53.2% | 75.5% |
| Operating Margin | 17.8% | 28.6% |
| Net Margin | 13.9% | 22.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 4.1% | 14.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 3.4% | 80.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.07 | $2.68 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $4.3B | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.9B | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.6B | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.4B | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.2B | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.6B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.4B | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.4B | $1.5B |
| Q4 25 | $605.0M | $561.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $637.0M | $274.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $586.0M | $-517.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $485.0M | $203.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $585.0M | $310.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $996.0M | $186.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $329.0M | $159.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $501.0M | $139.4M |
| Q4 25 | 53.2% | 75.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 51.9% | 76.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 52.6% | 76.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 53.5% | 76.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 53.5% | 74.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 51.3% | 75.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 52.8% | 74.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 52.2% | 74.7% |
| Q4 25 | 17.8% | 28.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 16.4% | 19.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.1% | -33.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.2% | 16.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 18.6% | 22.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.7% | 16.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.4% | 14.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 16.2% | 13.8% |
| Q4 25 | 13.9% | 22.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.1% | 16.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.9% | -30.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.9% | 12.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.0% | 14.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.6% | 12.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.5% | 10.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 11.4% | 9.4% |
| Q4 25 | $1.07 | $2.68 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.12 | $1.28 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.04 | $-2.30 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.86 | $0.95 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.02 | $1.38 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.74 | $0.79 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.57 | $0.67 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.87 | $0.60 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $1.1B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $7.6B | $2.4B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $20.3B | $551.2M |
| Total Assets | $41.9B | $6.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.37× | 4.32× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $743.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $7.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $7.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $7.4B |
| Q4 25 | $7.6B | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.9B | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.3B | $2.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.2B | $2.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.6B | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.7B | $7.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.1B | $6.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.6B | $7.7B |
| Q4 25 | $20.3B | $551.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $20.3B | $399.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $19.9B | $857.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $19.2B | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $20.5B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $21.6B | $3.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $20.8B | $2.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | $20.9B | $2.8B |
| Q4 25 | $41.9B | $6.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $42.0B | $6.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $42.5B | $6.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $42.0B | $7.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $42.6B | $7.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $44.2B | $13.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $45.6B | $13.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $46.4B | $13.7B |
| Q4 25 | 0.37× | 4.32× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.44× | 5.95× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.42× | 2.77× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.42× | 1.59× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.32× | 1.78× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.36× | 2.35× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.34× | 2.39× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.36× | 2.77× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $699.0M | $1.1B |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $602.0M | $1.0B |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 13.9% | 41.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.2% | 1.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.16× | 1.93× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $4.4B | $1.6B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $699.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.1B | $112.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $446.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $241.0M | $144.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $777.0M | $506.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.3B | $119.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $256.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $743.0M | $97.8M |
| Q4 25 | $602.0M | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.7B | $80.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $977.0M | $411.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $154.0M | $113.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $694.0M | $475.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.9B | $93.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $998.0M | $209.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $661.0M | $78.8M |
| Q4 25 | 13.9% | 41.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 54.9% | 4.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.5% | 23.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.5% | 7.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.6% | 21.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 63.1% | 6.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 22.8% | 13.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 15.1% | 5.3% |
| Q4 25 | 2.2% | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.9% | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.0% | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.0% | 2.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.0% | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.1% | 1.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.1% | 2.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.9% | 1.3% |
| Q4 25 | 1.16× | 1.93× | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.86× | 0.41× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.83× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.50× | 0.71× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.33× | 1.63× | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.35× | 0.64× | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.31× | 1.61× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.48× | 0.70× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
EMR
| Other | $1.8B | 41% |
| Software And Systems | $1.0B | 24% |
| Intelligent Devices | $996.0M | 23% |
| Safety And Productivity | $503.0M | 12% |
TPR
| Coach | $1.4B | 57% |
| Other | $787.0M | 31% |
| Kate Spade Company | $290.0M | 12% |
