vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Enlight Renewable Energy Ltd. (ENLT) and AMICUS THERAPEUTICS, INC. (FOLD). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
AMICUS THERAPEUTICS, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($185.2M vs $109.5M, roughly 1.7× Enlight Renewable Energy Ltd.).
Enlight Renewable Energy is a publicly traded company, headquartered in Israel, that builds and operates solar and wind power facilities. Its shares are traded on the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange and on Nasdaq (ENLT) following the company’s United States initial public offering in February 2023. In addition to solar and wind, Enlight develops utility-scale energy storage and agrivoltaic projects integrating agricultural land use with photovoltaic generation.
Amicus Therapeutics, Inc. is a public American biopharmaceutical company based in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. The company went public in 2007 under the Nasdaq trading symbol FOLD. This followed a 2006 planned offering and subsequent withdrawal, which would have established the trading symbol as AMTX Prior to their IPO, Amicus was funded by a variety of venture capital firms including Radius Ventures, Canaan Partners and New Enterprise Associates.
ENLT vs FOLD — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $109.5M | $185.2M |
| Net Profit | — | $1.7M |
| Gross Margin | — | 85.7% |
| Operating Margin | 60.1% | 8.6% |
| Net Margin | — | 0.9% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 23.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -88.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $123305879.00 | $0.00 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $109.5M | $185.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $169.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $84.7M | $154.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $90.4M | $125.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $73.8M | $149.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $58.3M | $141.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $52.6M | $126.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $71.0M | $110.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $17.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-24.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-21.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $14.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-6.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-15.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-48.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | 85.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 88.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 90.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 90.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 90.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 48.9% | 90.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 55.5% | 91.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 67.6% | 87.7% |
| Q4 25 | 60.1% | 8.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 20.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 41.2% | -6.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 47.4% | -6.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 58.1% | 10.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 73.2% | 15.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 63.7% | 11.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 55.0% | -25.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 10.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -15.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -17.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 9.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -4.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -12.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -43.9% |
| Q4 25 | $123305879.00 | $0.00 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.06 | ||
| Q2 25 | $125866004.00 | $-0.08 | ||
| Q1 25 | $122889909.00 | $-0.07 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.05 | ||
| Q3 24 | $125866004.00 | $-0.02 | ||
| Q2 24 | $125873060.00 | $-0.05 | ||
| Q1 24 | $117820495.00 | $-0.16 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $293.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $392.7M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $274.2M |
| Total Assets | — | $949.9M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 1.43× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $293.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $263.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $231.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $250.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $387.4M | $249.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $249.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $260.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $239.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | $392.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $392.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $391.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $390.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $390.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $389.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $388.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $388.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | $274.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $230.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $204.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $193.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4B | $194.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $178.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $132.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $130.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | $949.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $868.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $815.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $789.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.5B | $785.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $786.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $749.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $721.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.43× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.70× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.92× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.02× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.01× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.18× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.93× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.97× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $16.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $16.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 8.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 9.62× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $29.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $16.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $35.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-26.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $7.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $255.3M | $-3.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-23.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $22.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-29.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | $16.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $35.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-28.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $7.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-4.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-23.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $21.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-31.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | 8.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 20.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -18.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 6.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -2.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -16.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 17.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -28.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | 9.62× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.06× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -0.27× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ENLT
| Segment adjusted EBITDA | $99.7M | 91% |
| Tax benefits | $10.1M | 9% |
FOLD
| Other | $105.8M | 57% |
| Galafold | $64.8M | 35% |
| Pombiliti Opfolda | $14.6M | 8% |
