vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Enlight Renewable Energy Ltd. (ENLT) and Hess Midstream LP (HESM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Hess Midstream LP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($204.1M vs $109.5M, roughly 1.9× Enlight Renewable Energy Ltd.).
Enlight Renewable Energy is a publicly traded company, headquartered in Israel, that builds and operates solar and wind power facilities. Its shares are traded on the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange and on Nasdaq (ENLT) following the company’s United States initial public offering in February 2023. In addition to solar and wind, Enlight develops utility-scale energy storage and agrivoltaic projects integrating agricultural land use with photovoltaic generation.
Hess Corporation is an American global independent energy company involved in the exploration and production of crude oil and natural gas. It was formed by the merger of Hess Oil and Chemical and Amerada Petroleum in 1968. Leon Hess was CEO from the early 1960s until 1995, after which his son John B Hess succeeded him as chairman and CEO. The company agreed to be acquired by rival oil company Chevron in October 2023, and the acquisition closed in July 2025.
ENLT vs HESM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $109.5M | $204.1M |
| Net Profit | — | $157.7M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 60.1% | 116.7% |
| Net Margin | — | 77.3% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 2.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -2.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $123305879.00 | $0.68 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $204.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $109.5M | $404.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $420.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $84.7M | $414.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $90.4M | $382.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $73.8M | $395.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $58.3M | $378.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $52.6M | $365.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | $157.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $93.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $97.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $90.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $71.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $70.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $58.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $49.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 48.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 55.5% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 116.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | 60.1% | 62.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 61.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 41.2% | 62.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 47.4% | 62.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 58.1% | 61.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 73.2% | 61.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 63.7% | 60.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | 77.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 23.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 23.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 21.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 18.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 17.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 15.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 13.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.68 | ||
| Q4 25 | $123305879.00 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $125866004.00 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $122889909.00 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $125866004.00 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $125873060.00 | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $253.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 51.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.61× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $253.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $245.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $258.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $276.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $202.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $255.3M | $258.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $224.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $271.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $178.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $178.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $213.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $156.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $163.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $132.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $207.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 44.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 42.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 51.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 41.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 41.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 35.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 56.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | 51.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 16.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 19.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 15.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 11.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 24.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 24.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 17.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.61× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 2.63× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.65× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.07× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.83× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.67× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.84× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 5.49× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ENLT
| Segment adjusted EBITDA | $99.7M | 91% |
| Tax benefits | $10.1M | 9% |
HESM
| Affiliate services | $197.9M | 97% |
| Third-party services | $6.2M | 3% |
