vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Enlight Renewable Energy Ltd. (ENLT) and SILICOM LTD. (SILC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Enlight Renewable Energy Ltd. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($109.5M vs $61.9M, roughly 1.8× SILICOM LTD.).
Enlight Renewable Energy is a publicly traded company, headquartered in Israel, that builds and operates solar and wind power facilities. Its shares are traded on the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange and on Nasdaq (ENLT) following the company’s United States initial public offering in February 2023. In addition to solar and wind, Enlight develops utility-scale energy storage and agrivoltaic projects integrating agricultural land use with photovoltaic generation.
Silicom Ltd. is a publicly traded company, headquartered in Israel, that specializes in the design, manufacture and marketing of connectivity solutions for a range of servers and server-based systems. Its shares are listed on the NASDAQ Global Market and on the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange. Silicom is a member of the RAD Group family of companies.
ENLT vs SILC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $109.5M | $61.9M |
| Net Profit | — | $-11.5M |
| Gross Margin | — | 30.6% |
| Operating Margin | 60.1% | -19.8% |
| Net Margin | — | -18.5% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 6.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 16.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $123305879.00 | $-2.01 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $109.5M | $61.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $84.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $90.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $73.8M | $58.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $58.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $52.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $71.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $-11.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-13.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 30.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 28.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 48.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 55.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 67.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | 60.1% | -19.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 41.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 47.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 58.1% | -22.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 73.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 63.7% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 55.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | -18.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -23.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $123305879.00 | $-2.01 | ||
| Q2 25 | $125866004.00 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $122889909.00 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-2.28 | ||
| Q3 24 | $125866004.00 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $125873060.00 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $117820495.00 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $42.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $117.5M |
| Total Assets | — | $152.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $42.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $387.4M | $72.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $117.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4B | $127.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $152.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.5B | $150.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $-2.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-3.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -5.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 1.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $-2.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $255.3M | $18.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $-3.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $17.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | -5.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 29.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ENLT
| Segment adjusted EBITDA | $99.7M | 91% |
| Tax benefits | $10.1M | 9% |
SILC
Segment breakdown not available.
