vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Enphase Energy (ENPH) and Kimco Realty (KIM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Kimco Realty is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($542.5M vs $282.9M, roughly 1.9× Enphase Energy). Kimco Realty runs the higher net margin — 27.9% vs -2.6%, a 30.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Kimco Realty posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (3.2% vs -20.6%). Over the past eight quarters, Kimco Realty's revenue compounded faster (3.8% CAGR vs -3.4%).

Enphase Energy, Inc. is an American energy technology company headquartered in Fremont, California, that develops and manufactures solar micro-inverters, battery energy storage, and EV charging stations primarily for residential customers. Enphase was established in 2006 and is the first company to successfully commercialize solar micro-inverters, which convert the direct current (DC) power generated by solar panels into grid-compatible alternating current (AC) for use or export.

Kimco Realty Corporation, headquartered in Jericho, New York, is a real estate investment trust that invests in shopping centers.

ENPH vs KIM — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
KIM
KIM
1.9× larger
KIM
$542.5M
$282.9M
ENPH
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
KIM
KIM
+23.8% gap
KIM
3.2%
-20.6%
ENPH
Higher net margin
KIM
KIM
30.5% more per $
KIM
27.9%
-2.6%
ENPH
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
KIM
KIM
Annualised
KIM
3.8%
-3.4%
ENPH

Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
ENPH
ENPH
KIM
KIM
Revenue
$282.9M
$542.5M
Net Profit
$-7.4M
$151.2M
Gross Margin
35.5%
Operating Margin
36.4%
Net Margin
-2.6%
27.9%
Revenue YoY
-20.6%
3.2%
Net Profit YoY
-124.9%
-9.0%
EPS (diluted)
$-0.06

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
ENPH
ENPH
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
$282.9M
Q4 25
$343.3M
$542.5M
Q3 25
$410.4M
$535.9M
Q2 25
$363.2M
$525.2M
Q1 25
$356.1M
$536.6M
Q4 24
$382.7M
$525.4M
Q3 24
$380.9M
$507.6M
Q2 24
$303.5M
$500.2M
Net Profit
ENPH
ENPH
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
$-7.4M
Q4 25
$38.7M
$151.2M
Q3 25
$66.6M
$137.8M
Q2 25
$37.1M
$163.0M
Q1 25
$29.7M
$132.8M
Q4 24
$62.2M
$166.0M
Q3 24
$45.8M
$136.0M
Q2 24
$10.8M
$119.7M
Gross Margin
ENPH
ENPH
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
35.5%
Q4 25
44.3%
Q3 25
47.8%
Q2 25
46.9%
Q1 25
47.2%
Q4 24
51.8%
Q3 24
46.8%
Q2 24
45.2%
Operating Margin
ENPH
ENPH
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
Q4 25
6.5%
36.4%
Q3 25
16.1%
34.9%
Q2 25
10.2%
39.2%
Q1 25
9.0%
33.6%
Q4 24
14.3%
31.7%
Q3 24
13.1%
33.7%
Q2 24
0.6%
32.1%
Net Margin
ENPH
ENPH
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
-2.6%
Q4 25
11.3%
27.9%
Q3 25
16.2%
25.7%
Q2 25
10.2%
31.0%
Q1 25
8.3%
24.8%
Q4 24
16.2%
31.6%
Q3 24
12.0%
26.8%
Q2 24
3.6%
23.9%
EPS (diluted)
ENPH
ENPH
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
$-0.06
Q4 25
$0.29
Q3 25
$0.50
Q2 25
$0.28
Q1 25
$0.22
Q4 24
$0.46
Q3 24
$0.33
Q2 24
$0.08

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
ENPH
ENPH
KIM
KIM
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$497.5M
$211.6M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$7.7B
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$1.1B
$10.4B
Total Assets
$2.7B
$19.7B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.74×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
ENPH
ENPH
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
$497.5M
Q4 25
$1.5B
$211.6M
Q3 25
$1.5B
$159.3M
Q2 25
$1.5B
$226.6M
Q1 25
$1.5B
$131.3M
Q4 24
$1.6B
$688.6M
Q3 24
$1.8B
$789.0M
Q2 24
$1.6B
$126.4M
Total Debt
ENPH
ENPH
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
Q4 25
$1.2B
$7.7B
Q3 25
$1.2B
Q2 25
$1.2B
Q1 25
$1.2B
Q4 24
$1.3B
$8.0B
Q3 24
$1.3B
Q2 24
$1.3B
Stockholders' Equity
ENPH
ENPH
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
$1.1B
Q4 25
$1.1B
$10.4B
Q3 25
$995.0M
$10.5B
Q2 25
$880.6M
$10.5B
Q1 25
$810.7M
$10.6B
Q4 24
$833.0M
$10.7B
Q3 24
$931.4M
$10.5B
Q2 24
$884.5M
$10.6B
Total Assets
ENPH
ENPH
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
$2.7B
Q4 25
$3.5B
$19.7B
Q3 25
$3.3B
$19.9B
Q2 25
$3.2B
$19.8B
Q1 25
$3.1B
$19.7B
Q4 24
$3.2B
$20.3B
Q3 24
$3.3B
$20.1B
Q2 24
$3.2B
$19.5B
Debt / Equity
ENPH
ENPH
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
Q4 25
1.11×
0.74×
Q3 25
1.21×
Q2 25
1.37×
Q1 25
1.48×
Q4 24
1.56×
0.75×
Q3 24
1.40×
Q2 24
1.47×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
ENPH
ENPH
KIM
KIM
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$102.9M
$258.4M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$83.0M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
29.3%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
0.0%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
1.71×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$145.1M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
ENPH
ENPH
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
$102.9M
Q4 25
$47.6M
$258.4M
Q3 25
$13.9M
$332.4M
Q2 25
$26.6M
$305.4M
Q1 25
$48.4M
$223.8M
Q4 24
$167.3M
$239.5M
Q3 24
$170.1M
$295.9M
Q2 24
$127.1M
$294.1M
Free Cash Flow
ENPH
ENPH
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
$83.0M
Q4 25
$37.8M
Q3 25
$5.9M
Q2 25
$18.4M
Q1 25
$33.8M
$205.4M
Q4 24
$159.2M
Q3 24
$161.6M
Q2 24
$117.4M
FCF Margin
ENPH
ENPH
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
29.3%
Q4 25
11.0%
Q3 25
1.4%
Q2 25
5.1%
Q1 25
9.5%
38.3%
Q4 24
41.6%
Q3 24
42.4%
Q2 24
38.7%
Capex Intensity
ENPH
ENPH
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
Q4 25
2.8%
0.0%
Q3 25
2.0%
0.0%
Q2 25
2.3%
0.0%
Q1 25
4.1%
3.4%
Q4 24
2.1%
Q3 24
2.2%
Q2 24
3.2%
Cash Conversion
ENPH
ENPH
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
Q4 25
1.23×
1.71×
Q3 25
0.21×
2.41×
Q2 25
0.72×
1.87×
Q1 25
1.63×
1.69×
Q4 24
2.69×
1.44×
Q3 24
3.72×
2.18×
Q2 24
11.73×
2.46×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Related Comparisons