vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ENERGIZER HOLDINGS, INC. (ENR) and Fluence Energy, Inc. (FLNC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ENERGIZER HOLDINGS, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($778.9M vs $475.2M, roughly 1.6× Fluence Energy, Inc.). ENERGIZER HOLDINGS, INC. runs the higher net margin — -0.4% vs -9.5%, a 9.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Fluence Energy, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (154.4% vs 6.5%). ENERGIZER HOLDINGS, INC. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($124.2M vs $-232.6M). Over the past eight quarters, ENERGIZER HOLDINGS, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (8.4% CAGR vs -12.7%).
Energizer Holdings, Inc. is an American manufacturer and one of the world's largest manufacturers of batteries, headquartered in Clayton, Missouri. It produces batteries under the Energizer, Ray-O-Vac, Varta, and Eveready brand names and formerly owned several personal care businesses until it separated that side of the business into a new company called Edgewell Personal Care in 2015.
Progress Energy was a power generation and distribution company. Prior to its merger with Duke Energy, it was a Fortune 500 energy company with more than 21,000 megawatts of generation capacity and $9 billion in annual revenues. Headquartered in Raleigh, North Carolina, Progress Energy includes two major electric utilities that serve approximately 3.1 million customers in the Carolinas and Florida. As an independent company, the last chairman and CEO of Progress Energy was William D. Johnson;...
ENR vs FLNC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 2026 vs Q1 2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $778.9M | $475.2M |
| Net Profit | $-3.4M | $-45.1M |
| Gross Margin | 32.9% | 4.9% |
| Operating Margin | -0.6% | -14.8% |
| Net Margin | -0.4% | -9.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 6.5% | 154.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | -115.2% | -8.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $-0.34 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $778.9M | $475.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $832.8M | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $725.3M | $602.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $662.9M | $431.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $731.7M | $186.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $805.7M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $701.4M | $483.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $663.3M | $623.1M |
| Q4 25 | $-3.4M | $-45.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $34.9M | $17.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $153.5M | $6.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $28.3M | $-31.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $22.3M | $-41.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $47.6M | $47.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-43.8M | $785.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $32.4M | $-9.2M |
| Q4 25 | 32.9% | 4.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 36.6% | 13.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 55.1% | 14.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 39.1% | 9.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 36.8% | 11.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 38.1% | 12.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 39.5% | 17.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 38.2% | 10.3% |
| Q4 25 | -0.6% | -14.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.4% | 4.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 22.6% | 1.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.5% | -10.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.1% | -31.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.4% | 6.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -8.2% | 1.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.4% | -2.3% |
| Q4 25 | -0.4% | -9.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.2% | 1.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.2% | 1.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.3% | -7.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.0% | -22.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.9% | 3.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -6.2% | 0.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.9% | -1.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.34 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.18 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.01 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.24 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.32 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.34 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.00 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.07 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $214.8M | $452.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $141.3M | $388.0M |
| Total Assets | $4.4B | $2.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $214.8M | $452.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $236.2M | $690.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $171.1M | $436.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $139.3M | $568.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $195.9M | $607.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $216.9M | $448.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $146.7M | $388.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $158.1M | $411.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.4B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.2B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.2B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.1B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.2B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.2B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.2B | — |
| Q4 25 | $141.3M | $388.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $169.9M | $429.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $183.2M | $407.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $133.9M | $388.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $140.6M | $409.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $135.8M | $472.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $123.4M | $421.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $191.3M | $413.1M |
| Q4 25 | $4.4B | $2.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.6B | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.5B | $2.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.2B | $2.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.2B | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.3B | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.2B | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.3B | $1.5B |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.28× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.57× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 23.56× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.17× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.51× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 26.04× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 16.86× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $149.5M | $-226.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $124.2M | $-232.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 15.9% | -48.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.2% | 1.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $145.0M | $-179.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $149.5M | $-226.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $61.5M | $265.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $21.4M | $-153.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-12.8M | $-46.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $77.0M | $-211.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $168.9M | $10.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $45.8M | $-21.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $36.8M | $70.9M |
| Q4 25 | $124.2M | $-232.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $46.7M | $260.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.9M | $-157.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-33.8M | $-50.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $42.4M | $-213.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $141.5M | $7.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $27.3M | $-23.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $10.3M | $69.9M |
| Q4 25 | 15.9% | -48.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.6% | 25.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.1% | -26.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -5.1% | -11.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.8% | -114.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 17.6% | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.9% | -4.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.6% | 11.2% |
| Q4 25 | 3.2% | 1.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.8% | 0.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.9% | 0.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.2% | 1.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.7% | 1.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.4% | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.6% | 0.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.0% | 0.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.76× | 14.81× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.14× | -24.61× | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.45× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.45× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.55× | 0.22× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -26.87× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.14× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ENR
| Alkaline Batteries | $666.5M | 86% |
| Auto Care | $93.7M | 12% |
| Lights | $18.7M | 2% |
FLNC
| Products | $450.9M | 95% |
| Services | $22.5M | 5% |
| Digital Applications And Solutions | $1.9M | 0% |
