vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ENANTA PHARMACEUTICALS INC (ENTA) and Stabilis Solutions, Inc. (SLNG). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ENANTA PHARMACEUTICALS INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($18.6M vs $13.3M, roughly 1.4× Stabilis Solutions, Inc.). Stabilis Solutions, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -2.0% vs -64.1%, a 62.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, ENANTA PHARMACEUTICALS INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (9.8% vs -23.3%). Stabilis Solutions, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-2.5M vs $-11.8M). Over the past eight quarters, ENANTA PHARMACEUTICALS INC's revenue compounded faster (4.5% CAGR vs -18.1%).
Enanta Pharmaceuticals Inc is a clinical-stage biotechnology company that develops innovative antiviral therapies for infectious diseases including hepatitis B virus, respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), and SARS-CoV-2. It operates primarily in the U.S. and global markets, partnering with pharmaceutical firms to advance its small molecule drug candidate pipeline for patients with unmet medical needs.
Stabilis Solutions, Inc.SLNGEarnings & Financial Report
Stabilis Solutions, Inc. is a leading North American small-scale liquefied natural gas (LNG) producer and distributor. It supplies LNG fuel, cryogenic services, and full-cycle energy solutions to industrial, remote power, transportation, and commercial clients across the United States and Canada, advancing low-emission energy transition efforts.
ENTA vs SLNG — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $18.6M | $13.3M |
| Net Profit | $-11.9M | $-262.0K |
| Gross Margin | — | 24.7% |
| Operating Margin | -60.5% | -2.4% |
| Net Margin | -64.1% | -2.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 9.8% | -23.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | 46.4% | -112.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.42 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $18.6M | $13.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.1M | $20.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.3M | $17.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.9M | $17.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $17.0M | $17.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.6M | $17.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.0M | $18.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $17.1M | $19.8M |
| Q4 25 | $-11.9M | $-262.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $-18.7M | $1.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-18.3M | $-613.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-22.6M | $-1.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-22.3M | $2.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-28.8M | $997.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-22.7M | $27.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-31.2M | $1.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | 24.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 27.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 26.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 26.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 28.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 28.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 27.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 31.6% |
| Q4 25 | -60.5% | -2.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -121.6% | 5.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -103.2% | -2.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -164.3% | -9.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -138.8% | 12.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -204.4% | 5.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -134.6% | 2.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -192.1% | 7.8% |
| Q4 25 | -64.1% | -2.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -123.6% | 5.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -99.7% | -3.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -151.7% | -9.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -131.4% | 12.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -197.3% | 5.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -126.1% | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | -182.7% | 7.4% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.42 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.88 | $0.06 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.85 | $-0.03 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.06 | $-0.09 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.05 | $0.12 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.36 | $0.05 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.07 | $0.00 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.47 | $0.08 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $37.4M | $7.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $7.9M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $126.6M | $66.7M |
| Total Assets | $329.5M | $83.1M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.12× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $37.4M | $7.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $32.3M | $10.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $44.8M | $12.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $60.2M | $9.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $84.3M | $9.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $37.2M | $12.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $35.8M | $11.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $63.5M | $8.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | $7.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $8.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $7.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $8.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $8.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $9.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $8.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $9.1M |
| Q4 25 | $126.6M | $66.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $64.7M | $66.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $79.3M | $65.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $93.5M | $65.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $111.8M | $67.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $128.8M | $65.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $148.9M | $63.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $166.1M | $63.2M |
| Q4 25 | $329.5M | $83.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $280.7M | $87.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $301.0M | $83.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $323.0M | $83.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $348.6M | $85.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $376.7M | $89.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $398.8M | $82.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $413.6M | $80.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.12× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.12× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.12× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.13× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.13× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.14× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.13× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.14× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-11.7M | $669.0K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-11.8M | $-2.5M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -63.6% | -18.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.8% | 23.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-18.5M | $462.0K |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-11.7M | $669.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $-6.5M | $2.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $17.5M | $4.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-13.5M | $1.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-16.8M | $2.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-10.4M | $2.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-14.8M | $5.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-28.6M | $3.9M |
| Q4 25 | $-11.8M | $-2.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-7.9M | $-1.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $17.4M | $3.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-16.0M | $538.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $-25.5M | $-3.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-19.4M | $1.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-21.3M | $3.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-30.3M | $3.1M |
| Q4 25 | -63.6% | -18.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -52.5% | -7.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 94.7% | 22.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -107.4% | 3.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -150.6% | -19.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -132.5% | 7.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -118.6% | 19.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -177.5% | 15.5% |
| Q4 25 | 0.8% | 23.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.6% | 19.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.8% | 3.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 17.0% | 2.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 51.6% | 32.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 61.3% | 7.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 36.4% | 7.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 9.8% | 4.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.14× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.03× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.56× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 186.59× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.67× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ENTA
Segment breakdown not available.
SLNG
| Natural Gas Gathering Transportation Marketing And Processing | $11.1M | 84% |
| Other | $1.3M | 10% |
| Services | $897.0K | 7% |
