vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ENTEGRIS INC (ENTG) and Gaming & Leisure Properties, Inc. (GLPI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ENTEGRIS INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($823.9M vs $420.0M, roughly 2.0× Gaming & Leisure Properties, Inc.). Gaming & Leisure Properties, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 57.0% vs 6.0%, a 51.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Gaming & Leisure Properties, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (6.3% vs -3.1%). Over the past eight quarters, Gaming & Leisure Properties, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (5.0% CAGR vs 3.4%).
Entegris, Inc. is a supplier of materials for the semiconductor and other high-tech industries. Entegris has approximately 8,000 employees throughout its global operations. It has manufacturing, customer service and/or research facilities in the United States, Canada, China, Germany, Israel, Japan, Malaysia, Singapore, South Korea, and Taiwan. The company’s corporate headquarters are in Billerica, Massachusetts.
Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc. is a real estate investment trust (REIT) specializing in casino properties, based in Wyomissing, Pennsylvania. It was formed in November 2013 as a corporate spin-off from Penn National Gaming. The company owns 62 casino properties, all of which are leased to other companies.
ENTG vs GLPI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $823.9M | $420.0M |
| Net Profit | $49.4M | $239.4M |
| Gross Margin | 43.8% | — |
| Operating Margin | 12.7% | 79.4% |
| Net Margin | 6.0% | 57.0% |
| Revenue YoY | -3.1% | 6.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | -51.7% | 40.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.33 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $420.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $823.9M | $407.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $807.1M | $397.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $792.4M | $394.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $773.2M | $395.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $849.8M | $389.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $807.7M | $385.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $812.7M | $380.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | $239.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | $49.4M | $275.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $70.5M | $241.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $52.8M | $151.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $62.9M | $165.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $102.2M | $223.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $77.6M | $184.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $67.7M | $208.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 43.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 43.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 44.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 46.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 45.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 46.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 46.2% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 79.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | 12.7% | 89.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.2% | 84.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.4% | 61.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.8% | 65.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.6% | 79.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.9% | 70.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 16.0% | 77.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | 57.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.0% | 67.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.7% | 60.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.7% | 38.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.1% | 41.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.0% | 57.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.6% | 47.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.3% | 54.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.33 | $0.96 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.46 | $0.85 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.35 | $0.54 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.41 | $0.60 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.67 | $0.79 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.51 | $0.67 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.45 | $0.77 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $360.4M | $274.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $3.7B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $4.0B | $5.0B |
| Total Assets | $8.4B | $13.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.94× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $274.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $360.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $399.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $376.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $340.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $329.2M | $560.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $432.1M | $560.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $320.0M | $560.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.7B | $7.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.8B | $7.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.0B | $6.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.0B | $6.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.0B | $7.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.1B | $7.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.1B | $6.6B |
| Q1 26 | — | $5.0B | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.0B | $4.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.9B | $4.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.8B | $4.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.7B | $4.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.7B | $4.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.6B | $4.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.5B | $4.1B |
| Q1 26 | — | $13.8B | ||
| Q4 25 | $8.4B | $12.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.4B | $12.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.4B | $12.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.4B | $12.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.4B | $13.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.5B | $12.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.3B | $11.8B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.94× | 1.56× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.99× | 1.57× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.05× | 1.51× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.06× | 1.63× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.08× | 1.81× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.15× | 1.74× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.18× | 1.60× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $192.0M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $134.0M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 16.3% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 7.0% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 3.89× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $396.2M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $192.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $249.5M | $240.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $113.5M | $293.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $140.4M | $252.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $176.1M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $197.2M | $270.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $111.2M | $252.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $134.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $182.8M | $183.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $47.0M | $272.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $32.4M | $239.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $68.6M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $115.0M | $261.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $51.9M | $245.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 16.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 22.6% | 46.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.9% | 69.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.2% | 60.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.1% | 275.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.2% | 67.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.4% | 64.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 7.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.3% | 14.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.4% | 5.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.0% | 3.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.7% | 0.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.2% | 2.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.3% | 1.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.89× | 4.10× | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.54× | 1.00× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.15× | 1.94× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.23× | 1.53× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.72× | 4.80× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.54× | 1.46× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.64× | 1.21× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ENTG
| Fabs | $516.3M | 63% |
| Equipment And Engineering | $121.8M | 15% |
| Chemical And Materials | $83.8M | 10% |
| Other | $61.7M | 7% |
| Non Semi | $40.3M | 5% |
GLPI
Segment breakdown not available.
