vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ENTEGRIS INC (ENTG) and OLYMPIC STEEL INC (ZEUS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ENTEGRIS INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($823.9M vs $490.7M, roughly 1.7× OLYMPIC STEEL INC). ENTEGRIS INC runs the higher net margin — 6.0% vs 0.4%, a 5.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, OLYMPIC STEEL INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (4.4% vs -3.1%). ENTEGRIS INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($134.0M vs $-12.9M). Over the past eight quarters, ENTEGRIS INC's revenue compounded faster (3.4% CAGR vs 0.1%).
Entegris, Inc. is a supplier of materials for the semiconductor and other high-tech industries. Entegris has approximately 8,000 employees throughout its global operations. It has manufacturing, customer service and/or research facilities in the United States, Canada, China, Germany, Israel, Japan, Malaysia, Singapore, South Korea, and Taiwan. The company’s corporate headquarters are in Billerica, Massachusetts.
Olympic Steel, Inc. is a metals service center based in Cleveland, Ohio. The company processes and distributes carbon, coated and stainless flat-rolled sheet, coil and plate steel, aluminium alloy, tin plate, and metal-intensive branded products primarily in the United States. Metals processing and value added services include tempering, stretch leveling, cutting-to-length, slitting, edging, shearing, blanking, burning, forming, shot blasting, laser punching, plate rolling, fabricating, machi...
ENTG vs ZEUS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $823.9M | $490.7M |
| Net Profit | $49.4M | $2.2M |
| Gross Margin | 43.8% | — |
| Operating Margin | 12.7% | 1.5% |
| Net Margin | 6.0% | 0.4% |
| Revenue YoY | -3.1% | 4.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | -51.7% | -21.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.33 | $0.18 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $823.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $807.1M | $490.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $792.4M | $496.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $773.2M | $492.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $849.8M | $418.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $807.7M | $470.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $812.7M | $526.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $771.0M | $526.6M |
| Q4 25 | $49.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $70.5M | $2.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $52.8M | $5.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $62.9M | $2.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $102.2M | $3.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $77.6M | $2.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $67.7M | $7.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $45.3M | $8.7M |
| Q4 25 | 43.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 43.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 44.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 46.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 45.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 46.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 46.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 45.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | 12.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.2% | 1.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.4% | 2.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.8% | 1.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.6% | 2.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.9% | 1.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 16.0% | 2.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 15.3% | 3.0% |
| Q4 25 | 6.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.7% | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.7% | 1.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.1% | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.0% | 0.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.6% | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.3% | 1.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.9% | 1.7% |
| Q4 25 | $0.33 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.46 | $0.18 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.35 | $0.45 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.41 | $0.21 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.67 | $0.33 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.51 | $0.23 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.45 | $0.66 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.30 | $0.75 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $360.4M | $7.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $3.7B | $240.9M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $4.0B | $579.1M |
| Total Assets | $8.4B | $1.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.94× | 0.42× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $360.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $399.8M | $7.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $376.8M | $14.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $340.9M | $13.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $329.2M | $11.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $432.1M | $11.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $320.0M | $9.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $340.7M | $10.3M |
| Q4 25 | $3.7B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.8B | $240.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.0B | $233.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.0B | $235.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.0B | $272.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.1B | $197.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.1B | $209.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.2B | $196.8M |
| Q4 25 | $4.0B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.9B | $579.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.8B | $578.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.7B | $574.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.7B | $573.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.6B | $570.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.5B | $569.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.4B | $563.0M |
| Q4 25 | $8.4B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.4B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.4B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.4B | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.4B | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.5B | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.3B | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $8.4B | $1.0B |
| Q4 25 | 0.94× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.99× | 0.42× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.05× | 0.40× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.06× | 0.41× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.08× | 0.47× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.15× | 0.35× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.18× | 0.37× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.22× | 0.35× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $192.0M | $-5.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $134.0M | $-12.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 16.3% | -2.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 7.0% | 1.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 3.89× | -2.50× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $396.2M | $41.9M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $192.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $249.5M | $-5.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $113.5M | $15.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $140.4M | $49.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $176.1M | $14.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $197.2M | $24.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $111.2M | $-2.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $147.2M | $-2.6M |
| Q4 25 | $134.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $182.8M | $-12.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $47.0M | $6.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $32.4M | $40.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $68.6M | $7.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $115.0M | $15.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $51.9M | $-11.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $80.6M | $-7.4M |
| Q4 25 | 16.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 22.6% | -2.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.9% | 1.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.2% | 8.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.1% | 1.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.2% | 3.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.4% | -2.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 10.4% | -1.4% |
| Q4 25 | 7.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.3% | 1.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.4% | 1.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.0% | 1.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.7% | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.2% | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.3% | 1.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.6% | 0.9% |
| Q4 25 | 3.89× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.54× | -2.50× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.15× | 2.96× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.23× | 19.70× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.72× | 3.75× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.54× | 9.01× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.64× | -0.38× | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.25× | -0.30× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ENTG
| Fabs | $516.3M | 63% |
| Equipment And Engineering | $121.8M | 15% |
| Chemical And Materials | $83.8M | 10% |
| Other | $61.7M | 7% |
| Non Semi | $40.3M | 5% |
ZEUS
| Carbon Flat Products | $268.2M | 55% |
| Specialty Metals Flat Products | $140.9M | 29% |
| Tubular And Pipe Products | $81.6M | 17% |
