vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Evolus, Inc. (EOLS) and Sila Realty Trust, Inc. (SILA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Evolus, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($73.1M vs $50.1M, roughly 1.5× Sila Realty Trust, Inc.). Sila Realty Trust, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 10.0% vs -14.6%, a 24.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Sila Realty Trust, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (7.6% vs 6.7%). Over the past eight quarters, Evolus, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (4.6% CAGR vs -0.6%).
Evolus, Inc. is a medical aesthetics company focused on developing and commercializing non-surgical cosmetic treatment solutions. Its flagship product is a prescription neuromodulator designed to reduce moderate to severe glabellar frown lines, serving licensed aesthetic healthcare providers and consumers across North America, Europe, and key Asia-Pacific regional markets.
Sila Realty Trust, Inc. is a U.S.-based real estate investment trust that owns, operates, and acquires high-quality income-generating commercial properties. Its core portfolio covers industrial logistics facilities, office assets and mixed-use properties, serving tenants across logistics, corporate and retail segments to deliver stable long-term returns.
EOLS vs SILA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $73.1M | $50.1M |
| Net Profit | $-10.7M | $5.0M |
| Gross Margin | 66.9% | 88.9% |
| Operating Margin | 23.8% | — |
| Net Margin | -14.6% | 10.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 6.7% | 7.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -54.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.16 | $0.10 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $73.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $90.3M | $50.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $69.0M | $49.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $69.4M | $48.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $68.5M | $48.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $78.9M | $46.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $61.1M | $46.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $66.9M | $43.6M |
| Q1 26 | $-10.7M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $130.0K | $5.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-15.7M | $11.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-17.1M | $8.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-18.9M | $7.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-6.8M | $11.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-19.2M | $11.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-11.3M | $4.6M |
| Q1 26 | 66.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 65.7% | 88.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 66.5% | 88.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 65.3% | 87.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 68.1% | 86.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 66.7% | 87.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 68.9% | 87.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 70.3% | 86.6% |
| Q1 26 | 23.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -16.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -14.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -22.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -2.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -25.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -11.5% | — |
| Q1 26 | -14.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.1% | 10.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -22.8% | 23.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -24.7% | 17.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -27.6% | 16.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -8.6% | 23.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -31.4% | 25.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -17.0% | 10.6% |
| Q1 26 | $-0.16 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.01 | $0.10 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.24 | $0.21 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.27 | $0.15 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.30 | $0.14 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.11 | $0.20 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.30 | $0.21 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.18 | $0.08 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $49.8M | $32.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $156.4M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $1.3B |
| Total Assets | $220.6M | $2.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $49.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $53.8M | $32.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $43.5M | $27.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $61.7M | $24.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $67.9M | $30.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $87.0M | $39.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $85.0M | $28.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $93.7M | $87.0M |
| Q1 26 | $156.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $146.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $121.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $121.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $121.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $120.9M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-23.1M | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $-28.8M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $-18.7M | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $-6.6M | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.5M | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.9M | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $19.3M | $1.5B |
| Q1 26 | $220.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $225.9M | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $219.0M | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $228.8M | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $213.4M | $2.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $232.6M | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $229.6M | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $233.8M | $2.1B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.00× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.58× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.26× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $119.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 23.76× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $12.8M | $119.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-14.7M | $30.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-24.8M | $31.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-15.6M | $24.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.8M | $132.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-5.7M | $29.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-6.5M | $31.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $11.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-15.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-25.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-16.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-6.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-6.9M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 12.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -22.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -36.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -23.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -9.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -10.4% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.7% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 98.67× | 23.76× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.59× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.71× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.06× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 11.95× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.43× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 6.84× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
EOLS
| Product revenue, net | $72.7M | 99% |
| Service revenue | $390.0K | 1% |
SILA
Segment breakdown not available.
